^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

M/S. JAY JAY MILLS (INDIA) PVT. LTD vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER,
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

M.S. RAMESH

Pet. Counsel

Radhika Chandrasekar

Res. Counsel

R.swarnavel,

Petitioner / Applicant	M/S. JAY JAY MILLS (INDIA) PVT. LTD
Respondent	THE STATE TAX OFFICER,
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Sep 4, 2020
Order No.	W.P.No.28003 to 28005 & 28008 & 28011 of 2018
Citation	2020(9) TAXREPLY 3342
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 54

☍

Section 16

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
With the consent of both the parties, the Writ Petitions are taken up today and heard through video conferencing. 2. The petitioner herein had exported Knitwear and Knitted Fabric, which amounts to zero-rated supply and in terms of Section 16(3) of the IGST Act, 2017, had applied for refund of ITC under Section 54 of the CGST Act, 2017. The applications were made for the periods of July, August, September, October and November 2017. The petitioner's claim came to be rejected through five impugned orders, which are challenged in these Writ Petitions. Since the issue involved in all the Writ Petitions are identical in nature, all these Writ Petitions are disposed of, through a common order. 3. Though the petitioner herein had raised several grounds challenging the impugned rejection orders, the learned counsel for the petitioner had predominantly stressed upon the ground that the rejection orders do not give reasons for inadmissibility of refund and therefore they are non ....