Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,950 Results

Vide this order above mentioned two petitions would be disposed of as they involve common questions. We have heard learned counsel for the parties. Learned Additional Solicitor General has submitted that similar writ petition, i.e. Obelisk Composite Technology LLP Vs. Union of India & Others (D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18392/2019) has been disposed of by Co-ordinate Division Bench of this Court Principal Seat at Jodhpur vide order dated 12.12.2019. Hence, present petitions were ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SH. SAURABH GAHOI vs. M/S. PINKY SALES


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Sep 10, 2020)

1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 02.04.2019, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaint of the Applicant No. 1 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of rate reduction when the rate of GST was reduced from 18% to 5% in the foot wear (Shoes). as ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

REGISTAN EXPORTS vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, CGST DIVISION-F


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Sep 9, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s Registan Exports, G-174-175 & F-205, Garment Zone, EPIP Sitapura Industrial Area, Tonk Road, Jaipur-302022 (Rajasthan) (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against the Order-in-Original No. CGST DIV-F/38/19-20/10640 Dated 30.08.2019 (hereinafter referred to as the "impugned order") passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax Division...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This appeal is limited for a relief against the observations and directions contained in paragraphs (41) and (42) of the impugned judgment dated 28.2.2020, in a challenge raised by the appellant in W.P.No.24412 of 2019 relating to a dispute regarding acceptance of a bid and award of a contract pursuant to the tender notice dated 19.2.2019. 2. Another writ petition, being W.P.No.27267 of 2019, was filed by a separate petitioner, wherein the said petitioner claimed the bid for itself, and f...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JAY GOGA TRADERS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Sep 9, 2020)

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a proprietary concern, through its Proprietor has prayed for the following reliefs: "a. A writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order and/or directions in the nature of mandamus to quash the order issued by the respondent no.2 for confiscation of perishable goods and levy of penalty under Section 130 of the GST Act; b. A writ of mandamus, or any other appropriate writ, order...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UFV INDIA GLOBAL EDUCATION vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Sep 9, 2020)

The petitioner has prayed for the issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing the order dated 29.07.2020, provisionally attaching the bank account, maintained by the petitioner with respondent No. 3, letter dated 29.07.2020 issued by respondent No. 2 intimating the petitioner about the impugned attachment and order dated 06.08.2020 passed by respondent No. 2 rejecting the objections filed by the petitioner. The petitioner has also prayed for the issuance of a writ in...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HINDUSTAN TRADING vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Sep 8, 2020)

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant, a proprietary concern, has prayed for the following reliefs; “(A) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order directing the Respondents to forthwith release truck number GJ-04-AW-9027 along with goods contained therein; (B) This Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present Report dated 26.02.2020 has been received by this Authority from the Applicant No. 2, i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation in line with Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the DGAP has received a reference from the Standing Committee on Anti- Profiteering in respect of an application filed by the Applicant No. 1, under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER, CENTRAL TAX & CENTRAL EXCI.. vs. M/S INOX LEISURE LTD


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Sep 8, 2020)

1. The present Report dated 31.01.2020 has been furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation in line with Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that an application dated 22.05.2019 was filed by the Applicant No. 1 against the Respondent alleging profiteering in respect of supply of 'Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography f...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHIVALIK SILICA


(First Appellate Authority, Jaipur | Sep 7, 2020)

This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 by M/s. Shivalik Silica, 427, Krishna Nagar, Bharatpur-321001 (hereinafter also referred to as “the appellant”) against the Order-in-Original No. 20/2019-20, dated 18-6-2019 (hereinafter as the impugned order) passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods and Services Tax Division-F, Bharatpur (hereinafter called as the “adjudicating authority”). 2. Brief facts o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)