Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,950 Results

SUNITA JALAN vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER


(Calcutta High Court | Sep 16, 2020)

In view of the urgency, the matter is taken up virtually. CAN 1 of 2020 (Old CAN No. 4804 of 2020) is disposed of. The petitioner carries on business under the Trade Name of SAWARIYA STEEL INDUSTRIES. It is a proprietorship business. The petitioner carries on business from his office at 3C/H/5, Chhatu Babu Lane, Kolkata – 700014. A show cause notice dated February 4, 2020 was served upon the petitioner asking him to show cause as to why his registration would not be cancelled as...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BELL GRANITO CERAMICA LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Sep 16, 2020)

By this Civil Application, the applicant (original writ-applicant) has prayed for the following reliefs : “(a) The time limit for making payment of balance amount of ₹ 44,77,778 may kindly be extended and the Petitioner may please be permitted to make payment in 6 monthly installments. (b) Any just and proper order may please be passed in the facts and circumstances of the case for which act of kindness your applicant shall forever pray.” In the main matter, i.e. the...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The Court is convened through Video Conferencing mode. 2. Heard Mr. Pravat Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Sunil Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the opposite parties-Central Goods and Service Tax (CGST). 3. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner-M/s. OCL Iron and Steel Limited with the following prayer: "Therefore, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, it is most humbly and respectfully, prayed that this Hon'ble Court may g...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “a) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ of or in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to respondent no 7 to revoke the cancellation of registration; b) Your Lordships may be pleased to issue writ of or in the nature of a mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to Respondent No 9 to allo...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. FORMATIVE TEX FAX vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Sep 16, 2020)

1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “a) to quash and set-aside the impugned provisional attachment order, i.e. Form GST DRC-22, for both the premises i.e. for factory premises and residential premises issued in Form GST DRC 22 dated 24.07.2020 by respondent no.4. or As alternative prayer to allow the petitioner so change the bank and then create an additional charge along with ba...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. MIDCON POLYMERS PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Sep 16, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 1. M/s. Midcon Polymers Pvt. Ltd., (called as the ‘Applicant’ hereinafter), #3, 3rd Cross, Lalbagh Road,Near Garuda Maruthi Show Room,BengaIuru-560 027, having User-ID 292000000413AR6 have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01, discharging the fee of ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s Honda Motorcycle and Scooter India Private Limited, SPL-02(D), 2(E), 2(F) & 2(G) Tapukara Industrial Area, District-Alwar, Khushkhera, Rajasthan-301707 (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against the Order-in-Original No. RFD-06/BHD-C/029/2018-19/GST(Refund) dated 21.08.2019 (hereinafter referred to as "the impugned order") passed by the Assistant Commission...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner is before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for writ of certiorari to quash the order dated 16.03.2020 passed by the Commissioner of Central Tax (Appeals-II) in GST A.No.19-24/2019-20 A-II ADC No.39- 44/ADC/AII/GST/2020 dated 06.03.2020, Annexure- ‘AG’ to the writ petition as well as to quash show cause notice dated 04.06.2020 bearing No. C.No. IV/09/09/2019-20 ND-1 DIN: 20200657YW00009X3D76 which is at Annexure-‘AH’ and ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard Mr. Tushar Jarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner; Mrs. S.D. Vyas, learned AGP for respondent Nos.1, 3 and 4; and Mr. Jetly, learned senior counsel alongwith Mr. Mishra, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 to 5. 2. By filing this petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to refund an amount of ₹ 4,73,26,512.00 alongwith appropriate interest following encashment of eight bank guarantees dated 26th October, ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM APPL. 22639/2020 1. By way of this application, the Petitioners seek early hearing of the petition through video conferencing. Since no objection is raised on behalf of the Respondents, the application is allowed. Having regard to the fact that a short question is involved in the present petition, with the consent of the counsel for both parties, we proceed to hear the main petition for final disposal. 2. The application is disposed of accordingly. W.P.(C) 597/2019 & CM APP...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)