Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,949 Results

DEE VEE PROJECTS LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Aug 28, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. M/s. DEE VEE PROJECTS LIMITED (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant) is engaged in works contract. The Applicant is having a GST registration with GSTIN 23AAECD4519B128. 2. The provisions of the CGST Act and MPGST Act are identical, except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a specific mention of the dissi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. ADITYA INDUSTRIES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Himachal Pradesh | Aug 28, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Himachal Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and HPGST Act” respectively] by M/s., Aditya Industries, Trilok Pur Road Industrial road, Kala Amb, District Sirmour (H.P.) the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SH. PEEYUSH AWASTHI vs. M/S. SUN INFRA SERVICES PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Aug 27, 2020)

1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 2 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 29.10.2018, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaint of the Applicant No 1 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of Input Tax Credit (ITC) in respect of the Villa No. B-02 purchased by him in the Respondent...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CRL.M.A. 11494/2020 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1692/2020 2. The petitioner (Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Indore Regional Unit) has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 13.08.2020 passed by the learned Sessions Judge in Bail Application No.1576/2020, whereby the respondent was granted anticipatory bail. 3. Mr Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been forum hunting. H...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “I. To the respondent no. 4 to permit the Petitioner to file/upload statutory appeal on the GST web portal under section 107 of the GST Act, 2017 (as contained in Annexure-4) without adjusting the amount of pre- requisite 10% (₹ 71,842/-) amount of the assessed/disputed amount of tax against the demand (as contained in Annexure- 4/1) for filing of appeal against Assessment order dated 30.05.2019/30.8.2019 passed under section 62 of ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SH. PAWAN KUMAR AND OTHERS vs. M/S. S3 BUILDWELL LLP


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Aug 27, 2020)

1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 72 (here-in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 04.06.2019, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaints of the Applicant Nos. 1 to 71 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of input tax credit (ITC) in respect of the flats purchased by them in the project &ld...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SH. SANDEEP KUMAR AND OTHERS vs. M/S. NANI RESORTS AND FLORICULTURE PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Aug 27, 2020)

1. The brief facts of the present case are that the Applicant No. 8 (here- in-after referred to as the DGAP) vide his Report dated 22 04 2019, furnished to this Authority under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Services Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017, had submitted that he had conducted an investigation on the complaints of the Applicant Nos. 1 to 7 and found that the Respondent had not passed on the benefit of input tax credit (ITC) in respect of the flats purchased by them in the project &ldq...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S GURUKRIPA LUBRICANTS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Madhya Pradesh High Court | Aug 27, 2020)

Heard on the question of admission. By filing this petition, the petitioner has invoked Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus directing respondents to allow it to avail the short transitioning of input tax credit ("ITC) by either updating electronic credit ledger at their back end, in accord with the details of credit submitted by the petitioner or allowing them to revise form GST TRAN-1, in conformity with the returns filed under the existing laws that ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KOLHAPUR FOUNDRY AND ENGINEERING CLUSTER


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Aug 26, 2020)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by Kolhapur Foundry and Engineering Cluster, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the foll...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. VILAS CHANDANMAL GANDHI


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Aug 26, 2020)

(Proceedings under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. 2. The present appeal has bee...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


29
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)