^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE vs. MUKESH GARG
(Delhi High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

VIBHU BAKHRU

Pet. Counsel

Harpreet Singh

Res. Counsel

Mukul Rohtagi

Nalin Talwar

Shubhankar Jha

Petitioner / Applicant	DIRECTORATE GENERAL OF GST INTELLIGENCE
Respondent	MUKESH GARG
Court	Delhi High Court
State	Delhi
Date	Aug 27, 2020
Order No.	CRL.M.C. 1692/2020
Citation	2020(8) TAXREPLY 3289
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
CRL.M.A. 11494/2020 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 1692/2020 2. The petitioner (Directorate General of GST Intelligence, Indore Regional Unit) has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 13.08.2020 passed by the learned Sessions Judge in Bail Application No.1576/2020, whereby the respondent was granted anticipatory bail. 3. Mr Singh, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been forum hunting. He had approached this Court on 07.08.2020 by filing a writ petition (W.P.(Crl.) 1208/2020 captioned ‘Shri Mukesh Garg v. State Through Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Anr.) praying that appropriate directions be issued restraining the respondent (petitioner herein) from infringing the fundamental right of life and liberty. The respondent had impugned a notice dated 20.06.2020 issued by the petitioner, whereby he was called upon to appear before the Additional Assistant Dire....