Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

Heard. Rule, Rule made returnable forthwith. By consent of learned Counsel for the parties, this Petition is being disposed of finally. 2. By our order dated 5th November, 2020, we have passed a detailed order in Writ Petition (St.) No. 3705 of 2020. 3. Petitioner is a Limited Liability Partnership and is inter alia, engaged in the same business as the Petitioner in Writ Petition No.3705 of 2020 and having similar tax registrations. 4. Since all other facts are similar to the orde...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. By the consent of the Counsel for the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing. 2. Being aggrieved and dissatisfied by the inaction on the part of the Respondent authorities in not giving Input tax credit to the claim of the Petitioner pursuant to the Board Circular No. 39/13/2018-GST dated 3rd April, 2018, the Petitioner has sought to not only challenge the said inaction but also to challenge the vires of Rule 117 and Rule 118 of t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. 2. Case No. IV(06)121/AE/Alwar/2020 was registered for offence under Section 132(1)(b)(c)(f) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 3. It is contended by counsel for the petitioner- Hemant Kumar Singhal that case of the petitioner would not travel beyond Section 132(1)(f) of C.G.S.T. Act, the maximum punishment for which as provided under the Act is only six months. It is contended that petitioner has...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LALAN KUMAR vs. THE STATE OF BIHAR AND OTHERS


(Patna High Court | Nov 4, 2020)

Petitioner has prayed for the following relief(s):- “a) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of an appellate order dated 05.03.2020 issued vide memo number 51 Bhagalpur whereby the appeal preferred by the petitioner has been rejected; b) For issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the ex parte order of assessment dated 14.09.2019 issued vide reference number 690 in form GST ASMT- 13 by the Respondent No. 3.   c) For hold...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SH. AJAY KUMAR AND OTHER vs. PIVOTAL INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Nov 4, 2020)

1. The present Report dated 19.06.2019 has been received from the Applicant No. 3 i.e. the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that vide their applications dated 09.10.2018 and 16.12.2019 filed before the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017, the Applicant No. 1 and 2 had alleged profiteering by the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the assessment order passed by the second respondent on 08.11.2019. The petitioner has challenged the impugned assessment order on the ground that it is ex-facie, arbitrary and illegal and amounts to gross violation of principles of natural justice. 2. Heard Mr.B.Rooban, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs.J.Padmavathi Devi, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. It is the contention of the pe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NARAYAN KUMAR KHAITAN vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Orissa High Court | Nov 4, 2020)

In the wake of the Pandemic Covid-19, the case was taken up through Video Conferencing. 2. The petitioner being in custody in 2(C).C.C. No.170 of 2018, pending in the Court of the learned S.D.J.M., Panposh, Rourkela, has filed this petition for his release on bail. The offences alleged against him are punishable under Sections 132(1)(b) and 132(1)(l) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Tushar Kanta Satap...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner who is stated to be a supplier of diamonds, and a registered dealer under the Goods and Service Tax Act, within the jurisdiction of Mumbai, states that he had supplied diamonds to M/s. Nebal Tradings during the period 2017-18 and 2018-19 and the said transaction was duly declared in the GST return filed by the petitioner and the appropriate tax also paid. It is his specific case that no investigation is pending against him and no summons or notice has been served on him till da...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
These three appeals have been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by M/s T & D Electricals, S-1/8, RIICO Shopping Complex, Road No. I, VKI Area, Jaipur (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against the Orders-in-original (hereinafter as "the impugned orders") passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax Division-A, Jaipur (hereinafter called as the "adjudicating authority") as mentioned belo...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUMEET FACILITIES LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Nov 3, 2020)

Note: Any appeal against the Advance Ruling order shall be filed before the Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Chennai under Sub-section (1) of Section 100 of CGST ACT/TNGST Act 2017 within 30 days from the date on which the ruling sought to be appealed against is communicated. At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act are the same except for certain pro...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)