Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

M/S. IZ KARTEX


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Nov 10, 2020)

1. This Appeal has been filed by M/s. IZ Kartex named after P. G. Korobkov Ltd. on 17.08.2020 against Advance Ruling No. 04/WBAAR/2020-21 dated 29.06.2020, pronounced by the West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (hereinafter referred to as the WBAAR). 2. The appellant IZ-KARTEX named after P.G. Korobkov Ltd., Russian Federation, 196650, Russia, St. Petersburg, Kolpino, Izhorskiy, Zavod entered into a Maintenance and Repair Contract (hereinafter referred to as MARC) with Bharat Cok...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for a direction to direct the respondents 4 and 5 to grant retrospective registration with effect from 01.07.2017 for petitioner's Registration Certificate dated 07.06.2018 under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, by considering its representation dated 14.09.2020, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. Mr.R.Rajaraman, learned Senior Panel Counsel accepts notice for the first respondent, Mr.B.Vijay Karthikeyan,...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, who is an assessee to GST on the rolls of the 1st respondent, preferred an application to cancel his registration under the GST regime as he decided to transfer the business as a whole to a 3rd party. Unfortunately for the petitioner, in the application that he had preferred for cancelling the registration, he had inadvertently shown the reason for cancellation as 'discontinuance of business/ closure of business' whereas, in fact the reason ought to have been, "tr...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICAL LTD. vs. PRAKASH KUMAR AND ANOTHER


(Himachal Pradesh High Court | Nov 10, 2020)

The petitioner asserts that the judgment dated 20.11.2019 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.1551 of 2018, titled Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Versus Union of India & others, has been wilfully disobeyed by the respondents, hence, instant contempt petition has been preferred. 2. The aforementioned writ petition was filed by the petitioner with the submissions that in June, 2017, the petitioner-company had CENVAT Credit balance of Central Taxes amounting to ₹ 7,51,33,...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SAVITRI ASHIRVAAD BUILDTECH LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Nov 9, 2020)

Sub:-  C.T. Department Authority for clarification and Advance Rulings – Certain clarification sought by M/s. Savitri Ashirvaad Buildtech Limited – Application withdrawn - Regarding. Ref:- 1.  Application filed by M/s. Savitri Ashirvaad Buildtech Limited, dt:29-06-2018. 2.  CCT’s Ref No. A.R.Com/33/2018, dt: 07-07-2018. 3.  CCT’s Ref No. A.R.Com/33/2018, dt: 04-01-2020. 4.  CCT’s Ref No. A.R.Com/33/2018, dt:14-07-2020. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM Appl. 28287/2020 (exemption) in W.P. (C) 8787/2020 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P. (C) 8787/2020 The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent No.7 to dispose of petitioner’s letter dated 18th June, 2020 seeking permission to utilise transitional credit from July 2017 onwar...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

B.R. SRIDHAR


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Nov 7, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 Sri B.R. Sridhar (called as the ‘Applicant’ hereinafter), No.2328, 1st Floor, 20th Cross, Banashankari 2nd Stage, K.R.Road, Bangalore-560070, an un-registered person have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017 read with Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and under Section 97 of the KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of the KGST Rules 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01 ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This appeal has been filed under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 by Sh. Akshay Singh Rathore, M/s Laxmi Exports, First Floor, B-80/ Singh Bhoomi, Khatipura, Jaipur-302012 (Rajasthan) (hereinafter also referred to as "the appellant") against the Order No. ZA990420005927D Dated 21.04.2020 (hereinafter referred to as "the impugned order") passed by the Assistant Commissioner, Central Goods & Service Tax Division-B, Jaipur (hereinafter called as ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VEER PRATAB SINGH vs. STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | Nov 6, 2020)

The petitioners are dealers, inter alia, in brass and copper scraps, having their business concern in Coimbatore, Tamil Nadu and Jamnagar, Gujarat, respectively. A consignment of scrap that was being transported from Coimbatore to Gujarat from the 1st petitioner, as consigner, to the 2nd petitioner, as consignee, was detained by the respondents at Kodumuda in Palakkad. The detention notice issued to the petitioners indicates that the reason for detention was that the documents that accompanie...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GOKUL P.G. vs. THE STATE OF KERALA AND OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | Nov 6, 2020)

As both these writ petitions involve a common issue and pertain to the same transaction, they are taken up for consideration together and disposed by this common judgment. 2. The petitioners are the owner of the goods consigned from Kanyakumari in Tamil Nadu to Kalyan in Maharashtra, as well as the owner of the vehicle in which the said goods were being transported. The goods and the vehicle, during the course of transit through the State of Kerala, were detained by the respondents at Vat...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)