Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,905 Results

M/S RP ENTERPRISES vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Nov 11, 2020)

The present petition has been filed alleging that the petitioner is a registered dealer under the U.P. GST Act w.e.f. 2.6.2020 and as per the order received from various shop keepers, the petitioner loaded the goods on the vehicle for its transport and delivery to the said purchasers, however, the vehicle of the petitioner were seized on 2.10.2020 merely on the ground that invoice was found to be in the name of some other party. The submission of the counsel for the petitioner is that alt...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. : 2. Present writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking a direction to the respondents to release the refund qua the refund applications filed by it in respect of export for the months of July and August, 2019. 3. Mr. Priyadarshi Manish, learned counsel for the petitioner states that procured goods had been exported under Section 16 of Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘IGST Act’)...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The petition has been heard by way of video conferencing. 2. The petitioner by way of the present writ petition challenges the order dated 01st June, 2020 passed by the Appellate Authority whereby the respondent have denied refund due to the petitioner in spite of the fact that the petitioner had made exports of goods outside India and such exports are regarded as zero rated supplies under Section 16 of the Integrated Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘IGST Act’) ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. IZ KARTEX


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Nov 10, 2020)

1. This Appeal has been filed by M/s. IZ Kartex named after P. G. Korobkov Ltd. on 17.08.2020 against Advance Ruling No. 04/WBAAR/2020-21 dated 29.06.2020, pronounced by the West Bengal Authority for Advance Ruling (hereinafter referred to as the WBAAR). 2. The appellant IZ-KARTEX named after P.G. Korobkov Ltd., Russian Federation, 196650, Russia, St. Petersburg, Kolpino, Izhorskiy, Zavod entered into a Maintenance and Repair Contract (hereinafter referred to as MARC) with Bharat Cok...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This writ petition has been filed for a Mandamus seeking for a direction to direct the respondents 4 and 5 to grant retrospective registration with effect from 01.07.2017 for petitioner's Registration Certificate dated 07.06.2018 under the Tamil Nadu Goods and Service Tax Act, by considering its representation dated 14.09.2020, within a time frame to be fixed by this Court. 2. Mr.R.Rajaraman, learned Senior Panel Counsel accepts notice for the first respondent, Mr.B.Vijay Karthikeyan,...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, who is an assessee to GST on the rolls of the 1st respondent, preferred an application to cancel his registration under the GST regime as he decided to transfer the business as a whole to a 3rd party. Unfortunately for the petitioner, in the application that he had preferred for cancelling the registration, he had inadvertently shown the reason for cancellation as 'discontinuance of business/ closure of business' whereas, in fact the reason ought to have been, "tr...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MACLEODS PHARMACEUTICAL LTD. vs. PRAKASH KUMAR AND ANOTHER


(Himachal Pradesh High Court | Nov 10, 2020)

The petitioner asserts that the judgment dated 20.11.2019 passed by a Division Bench of this Court in CWP No.1551 of 2018, titled Macleods Pharmaceuticals Ltd. Versus Union of India & others, has been wilfully disobeyed by the respondents, hence, instant contempt petition has been preferred. 2. The aforementioned writ petition was filed by the petitioner with the submissions that in June, 2017, the petitioner-company had CENVAT Credit balance of Central Taxes amounting to ₹ 7,51,33,...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SAVITRI ASHIRVAAD BUILDTECH LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Nov 9, 2020)

Sub:-  C.T. Department Authority for clarification and Advance Rulings – Certain clarification sought by M/s. Savitri Ashirvaad Buildtech Limited – Application withdrawn - Regarding. Ref:- 1.  Application filed by M/s. Savitri Ashirvaad Buildtech Limited, dt:29-06-2018. 2.  CCT’s Ref No. A.R.Com/33/2018, dt: 07-07-2018. 3.  CCT’s Ref No. A.R.Com/33/2018, dt: 04-01-2020. 4.  CCT’s Ref No. A.R.Com/33/2018, dt:14-07-2020. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM Appl. 28287/2020 (exemption) in W.P. (C) 8787/2020 Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P. (C) 8787/2020 The petition has been listed before this Bench by the Registry in view of the urgency expressed therein. The same has been heard by way of video conferencing. Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to respondent No.7 to dispose of petitioner’s letter dated 18th June, 2020 seeking permission to utilise transitional credit from July 2017 onwar...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

B.R. SRIDHAR


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Nov 7, 2020)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER 98(4) OF THE KGST ACT, 2017 Sri B.R. Sridhar (called as the ‘Applicant’ hereinafter), No.2328, 1st Floor, 20th Cross, Banashankari 2nd Stage, K.R.Road, Bangalore-560070, an un-registered person have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017 read with Rule 104 of the CGST Rules, 2017 and under Section 97 of the KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of the KGST Rules 2017, in FORM GST ARA-01 ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)