Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,064 Results

INDER PARTAP SINGH vs. STATE OF HARYANA


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Dec 17, 2020)

The petitioner being the sole proprietor of M/s Shri Balaji Wooltex is sought to be prosecuted by the State under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 259 and 120-B IPC on account of his firm having wrongly adjudged input tax credit resulting in loss of tax to the Government exchequer to the extent of ₹ 2.24 crores (approximately). After his arrest in the afore-referred matter, the petitioner filed an application before the Trial Court seeking regular bail which was allowed by the Trial Co...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, which is a sole proprietorship firm, has challenged fundamentally two orders being the order dated 15.11.2018 [Annnexure-4 to the writ petition] and the decision contained in the communication dated 17.12.2019 [Annexure-6 to the writ petition]. In addition, it has been urged by the petitioner that the defects/errors manifest in the showcause notice dated 10.10.2018 [Annexure-2 to the writ petition]...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S METENERE LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Dec 17, 2020)

ORDER 1. Heard Sri A.P. Mathur, counsel for the petitioner, Sri B.K.S. Raghuvansi, counsel for the respondents and perused the record. 2. Petitioner has filed the present writ petition challenging the order passed by the Additional Commissioner GST, Gautam Buddh Nagar being the order dated 27.1.2020 as well as the Appellate Order dated 15.1.2020, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed. As the Tribunal as provided for under the GST Act has not been constituted an...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 24.1.2019 passed by the respondent no. 3, whereby a tax demand of ₹ 91,450/- and interest thereon has been passed as per GST DRC-07 as well as the order dated 27.7.2020 passed by the Appellate Authority under Section 107 of the GST Act, whereby the appeal filed by the petitioner has been dismissed on the grounds of limitation. The petitioner claims to b...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ANDRU RAMESH BABU


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Dec 16, 2020)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST Act, 2017 and SGST Act, 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ANDRU USHA RANI


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Dec 16, 2020)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST Act, 2017 and SGST Act, 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ANDRU SUJATHA


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Dec 16, 2020)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST Act, 2017 and SGST Act, 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VEMPATI VEERRAJU


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Dec 16, 2020)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST Act, 2017 and SGST Act, 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a ref...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MANYAM VENKATESWARA RAO


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Dec 16, 2020)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST Act, 2017 and SGST Act, 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MANYAM VENKATA RAJINI


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Dec 16, 2020)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST Act, 2017 and SGST Act, 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


9
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
10 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-7

GSTR-7 for the m/o Apr 2025 (For TDS Deductors u/s 51 - Section 39(3)).

☑ Monthly | GSTR-8

GSTR-8 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For TCS collection by E-Commerce Operators - Section 52(4)].

11 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-1

GSTR-1 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayers) - N.No. 83/2020.

13 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5

GSTR-5 for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by Non Resident Taxpayers - Rule 63 - Section 39(5)]

☑ Monthly | GSTR-6

GSTR-6 for the m/o Apr 2025 [For Input Service Distributors - Rule 65 & Section 39(4)].

☑ Monthly | IFF

IFF for the m/o Apr 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers, Optional) - Rule 59(2).

20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).