^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

TVL. J.F. INTERNATIONAL vs. THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES AND OTHERS
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

ABDUL QUDDHOSE

Pet. Counsel

B.rooban

Res. Counsel

J.padmavathi Devi

Petitioner / Applicant	TVL. J.F. INTERNATIONAL
Respondent	THE COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAXES AND OTHERS
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Nov 4, 2020
Order No.	W.P.(MD)No.2609 of 2020 and W.M.P.(MD),No.2255 of 2020
Citation	2020(11) TAXREPLY 3519
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AA |

ORDER
This Writ Petition has been filed challenging the assessment order passed by the second respondent on 08.11.2019. The petitioner has challenged the impugned assessment order on the ground that it is ex-facie, arbitrary and illegal and amounts to gross violation of principles of natural justice. 2. Heard Mr.B.Rooban, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mrs.J.Padmavathi Devi, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the respondents. 3. It is the contention of the petitioner that to the pre-assessment notice dated 16.10.2019, the petitioner had sent a detailed reply on 18.10.2019, raising various objections. The objections included the following:- “He is ready and willing to produce books of accounts and he has claimed only the eligible input tax credit under GSTR-3B returns filed by him with the respondent.” 4. It is the contention of the petitioner that despite sending replies on 10.10.2019, 11.10.2019 and on 18.10.2019, the same have ....