Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,969 Results

BABUL NATH vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Tripura High Court | Apr 13, 2021)

Heard Shri D. Saraf, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as Shri P.K. Dhar learned Sr. G.A. appearing for respondent Nos.2, 4, 5 & 6 and Mr. B. Majumder, learned CGC appearing for respondent Nos.1 and 3 for final disposal of the petition. Petition involves a short question. Petitioner is a dealer registered under various GST Acts. The Superintendent of GST had issued a notice on 13th May, 2019 pointing out that there were discrepancies in the petitioner’s declar...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHRI TAFIZ ALI vs. STATE OF TRIPURA AND OTHERS


(Tripura High Court | Apr 13, 2021)

Heard learned senior counsel Mr. B.N. Majumder for the petitioner and learned senior Government Advocate Mr. P.K. Dhar appearing on advance copy for the respondents for final disposal of the petition. Petitioner is a transporter. Petitioner’s Bolero jeep carrying electronic goods was intercepted at Churaibari on 31.03.2021 by the State GST authorities. The vehicle and the goods have been detained on the ground that the validity of the e-way bill which the driver was carrying had exp...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CHHAYA DEVI vs. UNION OF INDIA AND ANOTHER


(Allahabad High Court | Apr 13, 2021)

Heard Sri G.S. Chaturvedi, Senior Advocate, assisted by Abhinav Prasad, learned counsel for applicant(s), learned A.G.A. as well as Sri Ramesh Chandra Shukla, learned counsel appearing for opposite party and perused the record. 1. This bail application has been preferred by the accused-applicant(s), Smt. Chhaya Devi, who is involved in Case Crime No. 167 of 2021, under Sections 132(1)(1) and 132(1)(b) r/w 132(1)(i) of CGST Act, P.S.- CGST Noida, District- Meerut. 2. Learned counsel fo...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PAWAN KUMAR BANSAL vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Calcutta High Court | Apr 12, 2021)

This is an application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the petitioner praying for bail. The petitioner is one of the directors under the name and style of M/s M.L.U Metaliks Pvt. Ltd. He is also the proprietor of M/s M.L Udyog. Both the said company and the proprietorship concern are engaged in dealing with supply of Pig Iron. Allegation against the petitioner is that he supplied goods and services or both without issue of any invoice, in violation of the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TIRUMALA MILK PRODUCTS PVT LTD


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | Apr 9, 2021)

(Under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act and the Andhra Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act). At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the APGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the APGST Act. The present appeal has been filed under Section 1...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PARTH GUPTA vs. STATE TAX OFFICER AND OTHER


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Apr 9, 2021)

Case is taken up for hearing through video conferencing. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail in a case registered by State Tax Officer, Ludhiana, under Section 132(1)(c) of the Central GST Act, 2017 and Punjab GST Act, 2017. Copy of custody certificate by way of affidavit dated 09.04.2021 of the Deputy Superintendent, Central Jail, Ludhiana, submitted by the learned State counsel through email, is taken on record. Learned c...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MAHAKALI TRANSPORT vs. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANOTHER


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Apr 9, 2021)

CM-5455-CWP-2021 The application is allowed, as prayed for. CM-5485-CWP-2021 Heard counsel for the parties. The resolution is not clear as to how the interim release of the goods can be given as at the time of filing of the appeal, the petitioner has deposited the entire 100% of the tax, 100% of the penalty and 10% of the fine amount also. It seems that provisions of Sections 130 and 140 of Punjab Goods Service Tax Act, 2017 are not clear with respect to the release of the con...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER These batch of writ petitions were filed questioning the demand made by the Southern Railway to pay 18% of GST in respect of the license fee granted to the Private Contractors to run parking of vehicles. 2. At the first instance, this Court would like to look into the provisions of law with reference to collection of 18% GST as far as the parking areas, more specifically, in these batch of cases by the Southern Railway through their Private Contractors. 3. Section 2 o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

POOJA ENTERPRISE(NISHITH VIPINCHANDRA SHAH)


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Apr 8, 2021)

The appellant M/s. Pooja Enterprise, Plot No.2913, Old J Type Shed, 1st Phase, GIDC, Vapi, Gujarat-396191(Proprietor-Vipinchandra Shah) (hereinafter referred to as the appellant) is engaged in importing ‘Plastic Mechanical Liquid Dispensers’ from China and sell them in local market since 2011. The appellant has submitted that these dispensers are used as the caps of bottles and are used for dispensing liquid either through direct discharge or spray type discharge or foam type of d...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GIRISH RATHOD(JAY AMBEY)


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Apr 8, 2021)

The appellant M/s. Girish Rathod (Jay Ambey), Opp. Shri Govind Processors, 183-1, Bhagirath Process, Shahwadi, Ranipur, Narol, Ahmedabad-382405 (hereinafter referred to as the appellant) is engaged in the manufacture of various textile materials including Fusible Interlining fabrics of cotton, which is generally used in the market by tailor for stitching purpose and for preparing finished articles of clothing. 2. The appellant has submitted the manufacturing process of Fusible interlining...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


1
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S