Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,969 Results

Petitioner has challenged an order dated 03.07.2020 passed by the adjudicating authority as well as an order dated 27.01.2021 passed by the Appellate authority. 2. Brief facts are as under: Petitioner is a registered company and is engaged in supply of rice in the State of Tripura. According to the petitioner, the company supplies Non-Basmati un-branded rice. However, the State Goods and Service Tax Authorities, on a prior intelligence that the petitioner is dealing in branded rice, c...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The present writ appeal is arising out of the order dated 20.12.2019 passed by the learned Single Judge in WP No.52562/2019 (M/s. Mother Dairy Fruit & Vegetable Private Limited v. Union of India and others). 2. The issue involved in the present case is in respect of submission of Form TRAN-1 or revised Form TRAN-1 after the expiry date. The Division Bench of this Court has already decided the issue in question by an order dated 23.02.2021 passed in WA No.18/2020 and connected matters ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHAVESH KIRITBHAI KALANI vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Apr 19, 2021)

1. The petitioner herein is the proprietor of the Firm running in the name and style of M/s Global Corporation. It is acting as commission agent at Agricultural Produce Market Committee, Gondal with its valid license No. LIC/18424 of the market committee as required under Section 27 of the Gujarat Agriculture Produce Markets Act, 1963. 2. The petitioner has a valid GST Registration Certificate under the Provisions of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HUBLI-DHARWAD MUNICIPAL CORPORATION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Apr 19, 2021)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(2) OF CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER SECTION 98(2) oF KGST ACT, 2017 M/s Hubli Dharwad Municipal Corporation, (herein after referred to as ‘the applicant' or ‘HDMC') No.1, Sir Siddappa Kambli Road, Hubli-580020 having GSTIN number 29AAALH0164Q1ZQ, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017, read with Rule 104 of the CGST Rules and Section 97 of the KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules 2017, in FORM GST ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM APPL. 14911/2021 CM APPL. 14898/2021 1. Issue notice. 2. Ms. Sonu Bhatnagar, who appears on behalf of the contesting respondents, accepts notice. 3. We have queried Ms. Bhatnagar as to whether the statement made on behalf of the contesting respondents on 05.04.2021, holds. Ms. Bhatnagar says that the said statement holds. She adds that the demand raised in the subject show cause notice stands dropped. 4. Mr. J.K. Mittal, who appears on behalf of the applicant/petitioner...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Mr.Adithya Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.ANR.Jayaprathap, learned Government Advocate for the respondent. 2.The petitioner challenges order of the sole respondent i.e. the State Tax Officer, Vellore and T.V.Malai, Roving Squad (SPL) dated 17.10.2020 and consequently seeks a direction to the respondent to refund an amount of ₹ 1,82,860/-, which has been collected as penalty. Not just the order but even the notices leading to the passing of the impugned order, are...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
These writ petitions were filed questioning the demand made by the Southern Railway to pay 18% of GST in respect of the license fee granted to the Private Contractors to run parking of vehicles. 2. At the first instance, this Court would like to look into the provisions of law with reference to collection of 18% GST as far as the parking areas, more specifically, in these batch of cases by the Southern Railway through their Private Contractors. 3. Section 2 of the CGST Act enumerates ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondent herein to sanction the refund of IGST of ₹ 2,54,449/- paid by the petitioner in respect of the exported goods. 2. Though the Writ Petition has been filed on 17.08.2020 and though adjournment has been granted for filing counter affidavit, no counter affidavit has been filed till date. 3. The petitioner is a proprietor of M/s. Modern India Products, who is a merchant exporter having Goods and Service Tax regi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondent herein to sanction the refund of IGST of ₹ 2,35,008/- paid by the petitioner in respect of the exported goods. 2. Though the Writ Petition has been filed on 17.08.2020 and though adjournment has been granted for filing counter affidavit, no counter affidavit has been filed till date. 3.The petitioner is a proprietor of M/s. Raj Exim, who is a merchant exporter having Goods and Service Tax registration No. 3...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This writ petition has been filed challenging the provisional attachment of bank account of the petitioner pending proceedings for investigation. 2.I had, when the matter has come up for admission on 07.01.2021, stated at paragraph-3 as follows: '3. Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the since all the bank accounts of the petitioner have been attached, the petitioners’ business has been entirely crippled. It would suffice that some bank accounts, sufficient to pr...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


1
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S