Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

PAWAN KUMAR BANSAL vs. UNION OF INDIA
(Calcutta High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

BIBEK CHAUDHURI
Pet. Counsel
Milon Mukherjee
Sandipan Ganguly
J.p Khaitan
Res. Counsel
K. K. Maiti

Petitioner / Applicant

PAWAN KUMAR BANSAL
Respondent UNION OF INDIA
Court Calcutta High Court
State

West Bengal

Date Apr 12, 2021
Order No.

CRM 3100 of 2021

Citation

2021(4) TAXREPLY 4084
Add to Favorites Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)
Related Tags :

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

This is an application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure filed by the petitioner praying for bail. The petitioner is one of the directors under the name and style of M/s M.L.U Metaliks Pvt. Ltd. He is also the proprietor of M/s M.L Udyog. Both the said company and the proprietorship concern are engaged in dealing with supply of Pig Iron. Allegation against the petitioner is that he supplied goods and services or both without issue of any invoice, in violation of the provisions of CGST Act, 2017 or the rules made thereunder, with the intention to evade tax. Secondly, he issued all invoices and bills without supply of goods or services or both in violation of the provision of the Act or the rules made thereunder leading to wrongful availment or utilization of input tax credit or refund of tax. Abovementioned offences are punishable under Section 132 (1) (a)(b) of the CGST Act. It is submitted by Mr. Milon Mukherjee, learned Senior Counsel that hig....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
1
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S