Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

LUPIN LTD. AND OTHERS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | Mar 10, 2022)

01. Heard Sh. Bharat Raichandani, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sh. Jagpaul Singh, learned counsel for the respondents. 02. The petitioner has invoked the extraordinary discretionary jurisdiction of this Court for quashing of the order dated 26.08.2020 whereby the respondents have declined part of his claim for budgetary support for the period January to March, 2020. 03. Admittedly, the petitioner was entitled to exemption in Tax/Central Excise for a period of 10 years from t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CORBETT NATURE RESERVE, RAMNAGAR NAINITAL


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | Mar 10, 2022)

The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 and Uttarakhand Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 (in short the CGST Act and UKGST Act) by M/s Corbett Nature Reserves, Ramnagar, Nainital Uttarakhand (herein after referred to as 'Applicant') against the Advance Ruling Order 05/2021-22 dated 08-10-2021 passed by Authority of Advance Ruling of Uttarakhand in an application made by them. At the outset, we would like to mak...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This petition is filed seeking a prayer to quash the show cause notice dated 20.03.2020 vide Annexure P/5 and P/6 on various grounds. Presently, the respondents after taking notice have filed I.A. No. 2218 of 2021 enclosing a copy of the order dated 02.03.2021, as a consequence of notice Annexure P-5. They have also placed on record yet another order dated 03.03.2022 with respect to show cause notice vide Annexure P-6. Since the orders have already been passed, we do not find it neces...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AKSHAT JAIN vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Mar 10, 2022)

Heard Sri G.S. Chaturvedi, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Ms. Somya Chaturvedi and Mr. Somesh Khare, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Dileep Chandra Mathur, learned counsel for the opposite parties - Union of India and Senior Intelligence Officer, DGGI, Gurgram Zonal Unit and perused the material available on record. By way of the instant anticipatory bail application, prayer has been made for grant of anticipatory bail to the applicant in respect of Summons/Notice No. 4197, Dat...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned counsel for the respondents 2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order, dated 16.07.2019, cancelling the Goods and Services Tax Registration. The impugned order preceded the show cause notice, dated 04.07.2019. It is the specific case of the petitioner that the petitioner was not having business and therefore, the petitioner did not file returns. It is submitted that the petitioner in any event would have filed only a n...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This Criminal Original Petition is filed by the petitioner who was arrested on 10.01.2022 and remanded to judicial custody for the offences under Section 132(1)(b) & (c) of TNGST Act, 2017, in R.R.No.01 of 2022, on the file of the respondent police, seeks bail. 2. The magnitude of the loss to Government revenue as alleged to ₹ 5,16,66,620/-. The remand application of the Deputy Commissioner (State Taxes), Inspection – II, Intelligence Wing Chennai/complainant indicates that th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RASI NUTRI FOODS


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Mar 9, 2022)

1. In terms of Section 102 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017/Tamil Nadu Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 (“the Act”, in Short), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the appellant within a period of six months from...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M.P COMMODITIES PVT. LTD. vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 9, 2022)

1. The matter is taken up for final disposal with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties. 2. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants have prayed for the following reliefs: “(A) That Your Lordships may be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari, or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing and setting aside Orders in Form GST-DRC-07 dated 18.12.2021 and 27.12.2021 (Annexure - “F&rdqu...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs; “(a) Admit and allow the present petition; (b) issue writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ directing the respondent authorities to immediately sanction the refund of IGST of ₹ 7,69,093/- paid in regard to the goods exported i.,e., Zero Rated Supplies made vide shipping bills mentioned herein above; (c) to direct the respondent author...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

INDORAMA INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Himachal Pradesh High Court | Mar 9, 2022)

Notice. Mr. Balram Sharma, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India and Mr. Ajay Vaidya, learned Senior Additional Advocate General, appears and respectively waives service of notice on behalf of respondents No.1 to 4 and 5 & 6.   2. The petitioner has filed this petition under Section 226 of the Constitution of India, seeking following reliefs:- I. Issue a writ of certiorari or mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to quash the impugned circular bein...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


20
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).