Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,262 Results

SONU KUMAR KHUSHWAHA vs. STATE OF HARYANA


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Mar 29, 2022)

Prayer in this petition is for grant of regular bail in FIR No.111 dated 25.04.2019 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 120-B, 201 IPC, Sections 132(1)(i) & 132 (I)(iv) of CGST Act and Sections 65, 66D & 71 of I.T. Act, registered at Police Station Cheeka, District Kaithal. Learned counsel for the petitioner relies upon the order dated 11.11.2021 passed in CRM-M-41641-2021, vide which co-accused Ashish Kumar was granted the concession of regular bail. The operative part of the orde...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
O R D E R We decline to interfere in this Special Leave Petition. The Special Leave Petition is dismissed accordingly. However, we clarify that it is open to the petitioner to urge before the concerned authority that the show cause notice travels beyond the reasons delineated in Section 74 of the Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. That issue be considered by the appropriate authority on its own merits and in accordance with law. Pending applications, if any, stand dispos...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DAMODAR VALLEY CORPORATION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Jharkhand | Mar 28, 2022)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Pax Act, 2017 and the Jharkhand Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as "the CGST Act and JGST Act"| by Damodar Valley Corporation, 106-A, Administrative Building, Ground Floor, Area No. 6, Maithon, Dhanbad - 828207, Jha...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Petitioner is a registered dealer under the Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (for short 'the Act'). Petitioner challenges Ext.P4 order of assessment dated 14.03.2022 alleging the short assessment and input tax credit wrongly availed. 2. The grievance of the petitioner is that, the provisions of Section 42(3) read with Rule 36 of the CGST Rules has not been complied with by the assessing officer while issuing Ext.P4. According to the learned Counsel, non compliance with Section...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard Shri Aloke Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri B.P. Singh Kachhawaha, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:- “(i) Issue a suitable writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent no.2 to release the vehicle no.HR 55 S 1171 [so detained by the order dated 14.10.2020] of the petitioner. (ii) Issue any other suitable writ, order or...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner, who is the owner of certain goods, has sought for the following reliefs: ‘For quashing the first respondent’s order dated 03.03.2022 [Annexure “F”] for physical verification/inspection of the conveyance, goods and documents issued in form GST MOV-2 for goods conveyance bearing No. KA 32A 2003; and For directions in the nature of Mandamus directing the first respondent to release the goods vehicle in transit bearing Lorry No. KA 32A 2003 as per t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VAHANVATI STEELS vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 24, 2022)

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, the learned AGP waives service of Rule for and on behalf of respondents. 2. We have heard Ms. Manvi Damle, the learned counsel appearing for the writ applicant and Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, the learned AGP appearing for the respondents. 3. The writ applicant is a proprietor of a proprietary concern and he has been served with a show cause notice dated 29.02.2022 calling upon him to show cause as to why the GST registration should not be canc...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, the learned AGP waives service of Rule for and on behalf of respondents. 2. We have heard Ms. Manvi Damle, the learned counsel appearing for Nanavati & Co. for the writ applicant and Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, the learned AGP appearing for the respondents. 3. The writ applicant is a proprietor of a proprietary concern and he has been served with a show cause notice dated 02.11.2021 calling upon him to show cause as to why the GST registra...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has challenged the impugned order, dated 27.01.2021 and 29.01.2021 in W.P(MD).Nos.5274 and 5275 of 2022 and W.P.(MD).No. 5276 of 2022 respectively, only on the ground that the notice was issued in GST DRC-01 instead the notice has been issued manually. The learned counsel for the petitioner therefore submits that the writ petition is liable to be allowed. 2. Opposing the prayer, the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent placed reliance on the decision of ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SOHAN SINGH RAO vs. UNION OF INDIA,THROUGH SPECIAL PP


(Rajasthan High Court | Mar 24, 2022)

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439 Cr.P.C. arising out of file No.DGGI/INV/GST/2916/2021-Gr-K-O/o DD-DGGI/RU-Udaipur, relating to offence punishable under Sections 132 (1)(A), (F),(H),(I),(L) of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. 2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has been falsely implicated in this case. He is a simply Director in the M/s Miraj Products Private Limited. He is behind the bars since 13.01.2022. Lear...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


20
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).