Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,262 Results

AAKASH FOOD PRODUCTS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Mar 29, 2022)

A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furthe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PRECISION CAMSHAFTS LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 29, 2022)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Precision Camshafts Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. Whether the activity of design and development of patterns used for manufacturing of camshafts, for a customer is a composite supply, the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GROWTHMODE CONSULTING LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Mar 29, 2022)

1. M/s. Growthmode Consulting Limited, 7-1-27/2, Flat No.403, Suraj Mansion, Ameerpet, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500 016 (36AAACZ1781A1ZK) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CG...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAJASEKHAR REDDY TUMMURU


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Mar 29, 2022)

1. M/s. Rajasekhar Reddy Tummuru, Flat No 801 Survey No 19 To 25 And 42, 8th Floor, Block D, Fortune Prime Apartments Madhapur Village, Serilingampally Mandal Ranga Reddy District, Rangareddy, Telangana, 500081 (36ACWPT1601Q1ZT) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Theref...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HYDERABAD METROPOLITAN WATER SUPPLY AND SEWERAGE B..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Mar 29, 2022)

1. M/s. Hyderabad Metropolitan Water Supply And Sewerage Board 1, 4, HMWSSB Buildings, Finance Wing, 1, Khairatabad, Hyderabad, Telangana, 500 004 (36AAALH0186J1Z3) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar pro...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AGRO TECH FOODS LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Mar 29, 2022)

1. M/s. Agro Tech Foods Limited, 31, Sarojini Devi Road, Secunderabad, Rangareddy, Telangana - 500 003 (36AAECA0303M1Z0) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would a...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

POLI VASUDEVA REDDY


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Mar 29, 2022)

1. M/s. Poli Vasudeva Reddy, H. No. 8-3-682/1-B, Vishal Towers, Navodaya Colony, Yellaredddyguda, Hyderabad – 500 073 (Un Registered Tax Payer) has filed an application in FORM GST ARA-01 under Section 97(1) of TGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST/TGST Rules. 2. At the outset, it is made clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the TGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to any dissimilar provisions, a refe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. There is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 2. This writ petition is directed against order dated 26.03.2021, passed by the Commissioner, Central Goods and Service Tax and Central Excise (CGST and CX), Delhi East. 2.1. Via the impugned order, the petitioner’s current account maintained with Axis Bank Limited, F-2/25 at Krishna Nagar, Delhi-110051, stands frozen. 3. To be noted, this is the second round of litigation for the petitioner. 3.1. The petitioner&...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This writ petition has come to be filed by the petitioner- Podder and Podder Industries Pvt. Ltd. which is engaged in the business of selling of construction machinery. It is submitted that the petitioner sold certain construction materials to a buyer in Agartala from Silchar (State of Assam) and the said machine was transported through a truck/trailer bearing registration No.HR 38 Z – 6075 and the said vehicle was used to transport the materials from Silchar to Agartala. It is asserted...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The issue raised in these writ petitions since is common, with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for both sides, these writ petitions were heard together and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. A vehicle bearing Registration No.TN07 AV 7881 was intercepted by the respondent Revenue on 15.03.2022 at Manjambakkam Toll and at the time of interception, the driver or the person in charge of the vehicle had given a statement which was recorded on 15.03.2022. 3. During ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


20
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).