Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,262 Results

VIPUL JINDAL vs. STATE OF HARYANA THROUGH HGST OFFICER, PANIPAT


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Mar 31, 2022)

CRM-12147-2022 For the reasons mentioned in the application, the same is allowed and copies of orders passed in CWP No.8004 of 2020 and CWP No.18184 of 2020 are taken on record as Annexures P-12 to P-14, CRM-M-3550-2022 The petitioner is seeking concession of bail under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. in Complaint Case bearing No. COMA-2015 dated 27.06.2019/14.02.2020 (Annexure P-2) in a case No.GST/PNP/01 under Section 132 of the Haryana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. In compliance...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

WORLEY SERVICES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 31, 2022)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Worley Services India Private Limited the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions: A. Whether the services provided by the Applicant are classified under SI No. 24 (ii) of heading 9986 of the Rate Notification a...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LLOYDS REGISTER CONSULTING ENERGY PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Mar 31, 2022)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Lloyds Register Consulting Energy Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. Whether the project management consultancy services provided by the applicant to Vedanta Limited (Divisio...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MAA ASSOCIATES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Mar 30, 2022)

(Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and the Madhya Pradesh Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) 1. M/s Maa Associates (hereinafter referred to as 'Applicant'), is a company providing buses on hire(service) in Indore, Jabalpur & Bhopal City under smart city project with AICTSL, JCTSL &BCLL for the transportation of passenger. It is registered with the GST Authorities in the State of Madhya Pradesh and has been granted Registration N...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the impugned proceedings of the respondent passed in Reference Number:ZA3310180291241 dated 12.10.2018 and quash the same, as the impugned proceedings is in violation of principles of natural justice, cryptic, arbitrary and further direct the respondent to follow the order passed by this Court in W.P.No.25048 of 2021 dated 31.01.2022 in the batch of Writ Petitions relating to restoration of cancellation of regis...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SHREEJIKRUPA PROJECT LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Odisha | Mar 30, 2022)

M/s SHREEJIKRUPA PROJECT LIMITED, 165/1526, KHATA-184/753, Mouza- Ramachandrapur, Infront of Jatni High School, Jatni, Khordha, Odisha, 752050 (herein after referred to as the 'Applicant') having GSTIN : 21AALCS6689K1ZP, a company has filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 and Section 97 of the OGST Act, 2017 in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CGST Act and the SGST Act. Note: The applicant or jurisdictional offi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TAHURA ENTERPRISE vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 30, 2022)

1. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicants have prayed for the following reliefs:- (A) be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or writ in the nature of certiorari or any other appropriate writ or order quashing and setting aside order dated 10.7.2019 (annexed at Annexure A) passed for cancelling the registration certificate of the Petitioner under the GST Acts; (B) be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari or writ in the nature of c...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The challenge in this petition has been made to the orders dated 21.08.2018 (Annexure P/1) and 30.10.2019 (Annexure P/2) passed by respondent Nos. 2, Joint Commissioner State Tax, (Appellate Authority) Satna Division, Satna and 3, State Tax Officer, Anti Evasion Bureau, Satna & Sagar Division, Satna, respectively. 2. The fact reveals that the petitioner which is a private company engaged in the business of steel as well as HT wires, entered into an agreement with one M/s Reva Engineer...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM No.11361/2022 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. CM No.15316/2022 2. The record shows that the principal grievance articulated by the petitioner is that the amount due to it has not been refunded. 2.1. According to the petitioner, it is entitled to a refund of Unutilized Input Tax Credit (UITC) amounting to ₹ 8,63,156/-, which includes ₹ 1,85,528/- under Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) and ₹ 6,77,628/- under State Goods and Services Tax (SGST), concerning t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The substantive prayers made in the writ petition are as follows: “a) quash and set aside the refund rejection order dated 30.12.2020 passed by the Assistant Commissioner Central GST, Delhi South; b) direct the respondent to grant refund of ₹ 98,54,248/- claimed under CGST, SGST & Cess for the period September, 2020; c) direct the respondent to grant interest in terms of Section 56 under CGTST/SGST; 2. Notice in this writ petition was issued on 30.09.2021, where...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


21
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).