Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,262 Results

The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 25.03.2022 in Form GST Mov-9 seeking to impose penalty of ₹ 2,50,387/- under CGST and SGST each, totally for a sum of ₹ 5,00,774/- under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act, 2017. 2.The petitioner had consigned the goods from its main place of business at Chennai to its additional place of business, Sastha Bombalan Modern Rice Mill, 3/237-B, Chintamani Road, Anuppandi, Madurai. This was not the additional place of business, as per the ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SWATI ENTERPRISE vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 30, 2022)

1. Since the issues raised in both the captioned writ applications are the same, those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common order. 2. For the sake of convenience, the Special Civil Application No.1521 of 2021 is treated as the lead matter. 3. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs; “(A) Your Lordships may be pleased to admit this Petition. (...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Since the issues raised in all the captioned writ applications are the same, those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common order. For the sake of convenience, the Special Civil Application No.10367 of 2020 is treated as the lead matter. 2. By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicants have prayed for the following reliefs: “A. Your Lordships may be pleased to admit this petition; B. Your...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ROHIT RASTOGI vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Mar 30, 2022)

Heard Shri Bijendra Kumar Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant, Shri Dileep Chandra Mathur, learned counsel for the complainant and Shri I.P. Srivastava, learned AGA for the State. A case was lodged against the applicant as Case Crime No.928 of 2021 at Police Station Kaushambi District Ghaziabad, Directorate General of GST Intelligence (DGGI) Ghaziabad Regional Unit under Sections 132(1) (b)& (1) of CGST Act, 2017. The applicant is in jail since 10.09.2021 pursuant to the sai...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Certiorari calling for the connected records of the impugned proceedings of the 1st respondent herein made in GSTN 33FSKPS7710G1ZH/2017-18, TIN 33966287637/2017-18 dated 08.07.2021 and consequential recovery notice/attachment order dated 15.11.2021 passed in his proceedings in Roc.84/2021/A3 by the 1st respondent against the 2nd respondent herein and quash the same. 2. Under the GST Regime, the petitioner claim for Input Tax Credit was reverse...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The present Writ Petition came to be filed, seeking issuance of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondent no.1 in passing the “Order of Confiscation of Goods and Conveyance and Demand of Tax, Fine and Penalty” vide proceedings, dated 22.09.2021, under Section 130 of the State Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 [for short, “SGST Act, 2017”], as violative of Sub-Sections (3) and (6) of Section 129 and of Sub-Section (4) of Section 130 and the Rules made there...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PROVAT KUMAR KUNDU


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Mar 29, 2022)

A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furthe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SNG ENVIROSOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Mar 29, 2022)

A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furthe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VINIT GLOVES MANUFACTURING PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Mar 29, 2022)

A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furthe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NATHMULL BHAGCHAND JAIN


(Authority for Advance Ruling, West Bengal | Mar 29, 2022)

A person within the ambit of Section 100 (1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 or West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter collectively called ‘the GST Act’), if aggrieved by this Ruling, may appeal against it before the West Bengal Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, constituted under Section 99 of the West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, within a period of thirty days from the date of communication of this Ruling, or within such furthe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


20
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).