Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  13,223 Results

ROHIT MEHTA vs. SUPERINTENDENT (PREVENTIVE) AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Mar 9, 2022)

HARINDER SINGH SIDHU, J. Challenge in this petition is to the order dated 15.12.2021 passed by Ld. Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana, whereby the revision petition filed by the respondent (CGST Department) was allowed and the order dated 28.11.2021 of the Ld. Judicial Magistrate Ist Class (Duty), Ludhiana granting default bail u/s 167(2) Cr.P.C. to the petitioner was set aside. The petitioner was arrested on 28.09.2021 for the alleged commission of offence under Section 132 of the G...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

APEX LEATHER vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Mar 9, 2022)

1. On oral request of learned counsel for the petitioner, the GST Council, New Delhi through its Member Secretary is allowed to be impleaded as respondent No.5. 2. Notice on behalf of respondent No.5 has been accepted by the office of learned Additional Solicitor General. 3. Heard Sri Rahul Agarwal, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri B.P. Singh Kachhwah, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. Sri Amit Mahajan, learned Senior Standing Counsel - (Indirect Taxes) for th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ROYAL IMPEX vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Mar 9, 2022)

1. Rule returnable forthwith. Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, the learned AGP waives service of notice for and on behalf of the respondents. 2. By this writ-application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ-applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: "15(A) Be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or writ in the nature of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or order quashing and setting aside impugned confiscation notice in Form GST MOV 10 (annexed at Annexure A) and ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Brief facts of the case are, that the petitioner, which is a sole proprietorship enterprise, was initially issued with the Show Cause Notice No. C.No. V(15)Adj./M-II/Maurya/209/14/10637 dated 30.09.2014, which was issued by the Additional Commissioner, Central Excise and Service Tax, Meerut-II, as a consequence of exercising of his powers under the Finance Act of 1994, whereby, despite issuance of show cause notice dated 30.09.2014, when the petitioner has not participated or approached befor...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner herein has challenged the impugned Order-in- Appeal No.151/2021-JC [GSTA] dated 17.10.2021 passed by the first respondent Joint Commissioner of GST and Central Excise [Appeals]. 2. By the impugned order, the Joint Commissioner of GST and Central Excise [Appeals], has dismissed the appeal filed by the petitioner against order in Refund Order No.16/2021-2022, dated 16.08.2021, passed by the second respondent herein. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner h...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The prayer sought for herein is for a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus calling for the records of the Respondent in passing the impugned order bearing Ref.No: GSTIN:33AADCR7947K1ZY/2017-18 dated 09.07.2021 and quash the same and direct the Respondent to grant refund in the event of reversal of Input Tax Credit carried forward by filing Form TRAN-1. 2. In response to the show cause notice issued in respect of the refund claimed by the petitioner during the erstwhile TNVAT Act regime, the pe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

V.K. TRADERS vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Mar 8, 2022)

1. This anticipatory bail application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C.") has been filed by the applicants M/s V.K. Traders/ applicant No. 1 and Vipin Kumar/ applicant No. 2 (added as an applicant in pursuance of order dated 25.11.2021 of the court) before this Court directly without approaching the Sessions Judge with the following prayer: “It is, therefore most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may graciously be pleased to ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AVS TECH BUILDING SOLUTIONS INDIA PVT. LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Mar 8, 2022)

M/s. AVS Tech Building Solutions India Pvt. Ltd., #18, SJBC Complex, I Floor, Hosur Road, Attibele, Bengaluru - 562 107, having GSTIN 29AANCA2107N1ZE, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of the KGST Rules, 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/-each under CGST Act & KGST Act. 2. The Applicant is a Private Limited Company registered ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TEAMLEASE EDUCATION FOUNDATION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Mar 8, 2022)

M/s. Teamlease Education Foundation, (herein after referred to as The Applicant) 6th Floor, BMTC Commercial Complex, 80 Feet Road, Koramangala, Bengaluru-560 095, Karnataka, having GSTIN 29AADCT8958N1ZA, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules, 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under CGST Act & KGST Act. 2. The ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHARATIYA RESERVE BANK NOTE MUDRAN PRIVATE LIMITED..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Mar 8, 2022)

M/s. Bharatiya Reserve Bank Note Mudran (P) Limited (hereinafter referred to as “the applicant”), Note Mudran Nagar, BRBNMPL Township, KRS Road, Metagalli, Mysuru-570003, having GSTIN 29AAACB8111E1Z1, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules, 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CGST Act and the KGST A...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


20
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
20 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the m/o Apr 2025 (Monthly Taxpayer - Rule 61) - Either Compulsory taxpayer > 5 cr. or Voluntary taxpayer < 5 cr.

☑ Monthly | GSTR-5A

GSTR-5A for the m/o Apr 2025 [Return by OIDAR Service Providers - Rule 64.]

25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).