Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,306 Results

ANKUR vs. STATE OF HARYANA.


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Apr 28, 2022)

The Prayer in this petition under Section 482 Cr.PC is for quashing of FIR No.0629 dated 25.06.2019 under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471 IPC registered at Police Station Chandanibagh, District Panipat and all consequential proceedings arising/emanating out of the aforesaid FIR. 2. The allegations in the FIR are that the petitioner Ankur son of Sh. Harjit Pal, resident of Mandi Gobindgarh, Fatehgarh Sahib, Punjab and got himself registered under the CGST/HGST Act, 2017 under the name and styl...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has filed this writ petition for a Mandamus to direct the respondent to sanction a sum of Rs.24,72,018/- as refund on the exports made by the petitioner during July, 2017, September, 2017 and October, 2017. 2.It is the specific case of the petitioner that though the petitioner had correctly declared the details in the monthly returns in Form GSTR-1 regarding the exports made by the petitioner on payment of tax by debiting the input tax credit, a mistake was committed by the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. This Court vide common oral order dated 18.04.2022 has passed the following order: “1. We have heard Mr. Maulik Nanavati, the learned counsel appearing for the writ-applicant and Mr. Utkarsh Sharma, the learned AGP appearing for the respondents at length. 2. It appears from the materials on record that the writ-applicant herein is engaged in the business of metal scrap. The writ-applicant received an order of purchase of brass scrap from one M/s. Raj Khodal Metal, Jamnagar. T...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the parties. The present petition has been filed challenging the orders dated 29th March, 2019 and 23rd February, 2018 confirming the seizure of goods on the ground that U.P. E-Way bill was not accompanying the goods. Counsel for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present petition has already been decided by this Court in Writ Tax No. 898 of 2019 titled as M/s Jasvant Singh vs. State of U.P. and others. He prays for quashing of the impugned...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner seeks to assail the order dated 22.11.2019 passed by respondent No.5 contained in Annexure P/1 to the writ petition whereby respondent Nos.4 and 5 rejected the claim for refund of tax filed by the petitioner. 2. The facts of the case in nutshell are that the petitioner’s company which is registered under the provisions of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 was regularly filing return, however, the petitioner had to bear the burden of the tax. As the petitio...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned State Counsel representing the respondent Nos. 1 to 3. This petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging the order dated 30.10.2018 whereby the Assistant Commissioner, State Goods & Service Tax, Lucknow has cancelled the registration of the petitioner as a dealer. It has been pointed out by the learned counsel representing the State that the said order is appealable in terms of the pro...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
2. Issue notice. 2.1. Mr. Chiranjiv Kumar accepts notice on behalf of respondent no.1/UOI. 2.2. Mr. Anuj Aggarwal accepts notice on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 4/revenue. 3. With the consent of the counsels for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal, at this stage itself. 4. The substantial prayers made in the writ petition are as follows: “i. To issue an appropriate writ, order, or direction to Respondents to quash and set aside...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VIMAL YASHWANTGIRI GOSWAMI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Apr 28, 2022)

1. By way of the present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, the applicant-accused has prayed for bail in connection with File No.AC-1/ UNIT-75/BVN/201920 registered with the Office of the Assistant Commissioner of State Tax-1, Unit-75, 1 st Floor, Bahumali Bhawan, Bhavnagar and File No.ACCT-UNIT-9/HEUGO METAL/SUMMONS/2021-22 registered with the Office of Assistant Commissioner of State Tax, Unit-9, Division (1), Anmedabad; for the alleged offence punishable...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KULDEEP SING vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Apr 28, 2022)

1. This writ petition is filed against the order of suspension dated 07.01.2022. 2. This Court passed following order on 21.02.2022: "Instructions which have been filed in Writ - A No. 1069 of 2022 are also being used by the learned Standing Counsel in the instant writ petition to explain the case. On 27.7.2021, certain vehicles including a vehicle being Truck No. UP 23 AT 1745 were intercepted while going from Moradabad to Delhi. It was found that the Driver of the vehicle n...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HR FOOD PROCESSING (P) LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Jharkhand | Apr 27, 2022)

PROCEEDINGS (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Service Pax Act, 2017 and the Jharkhand Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97(1) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Jharkhand Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and JGST Act”] by H K Food Processing (P) Ltd, House No 448/ A, Ground Floor, Road NO. 4, Ashok Nagar, Ranchi - 834002, Jharkhand, I...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


23
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).