Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,306 Results

In these writ petitions, the challenge was the impugned orders of assessment dated 10.01.2020 made under Section 62(1) of the GST Act. 2. Assailing these orders, Mr.G.Natarajan, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would contend that, the period relates to December 2018 to August 2019, for which, the return could not be filed for variety of reasons attached with the dealer petitioner and ultimately these orders under Section 62(1) was passed. 3. If an order under Section62(1) ...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ULTRA TECH SUSPENSION PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttarakhand | Apr 27, 2022)

1. This is an application under Sub-section (1) of Section 97 of the Central Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 and Uttarakhand State Goods & Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as CGST/SGST Act) and the rules made there under filed by M/S Ultra Tech Suspension Private Limited, Plot No.- 29, LIE SIDCUL, Sector-Il, Pantnagar, Rudrapur, Udham Singh Nagar, Uttarakhand - 263153 (herein after referred to as the “applicant”), a company registered under the Companies Act, 2...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
A very short issue engages consideration in the present Writ Petition, where the petitioner has given a challenge to the order dated 20th August, 2019, which had been passed by respondent No.3, while exercising his power under Sub-section (1) of Section 129 of the Goods and Services Tax Act, as well as the appellate order dated 28th November, 2019, whereby the Appeal filed by the petitioner was dismissed, and consequently, affirming the imposition of the penalty, as it has been imposed by res...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Since this batch of writ applications involve similar facts and raises common questions of law, all those were taken up for hearing analogously and are being disposed of by this common order. We treat Special Civil Application No.6650 of 2022 as the lead matter. 2. By way of this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) Your Lordships be pleased to issue a Writ of Certiorari or a writ in the...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard Ms. Pooja Talwar, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Personal affidavit of respondent no.1 dated 25.04.2022 has been filed today, which is taken on record. 3. The aforesaid two writ petitions have been filed praying for the following reliefs:- Reliefs as prayed in Writ-Tax No.419 of 2022 Reliefs as prayed in Writ-Tax No.424 of 2022 ...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM APPL. 20281/2022 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 6680/2022 2. Issue notice to the respondents. 3. Mr Krishna K. Sharma accepts notice on behalf of the respondent no.1/Union of India (UOI). Likewise, Mr Vijay Joshi accepts notice on behalf of respondent nos.2 and 3. 4. With the consent of the counsel for the parties, the writ petition is taken up for hearing and final disposal, at this stage itself. 5. The substantive prayers made in the writ petition...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DHABRIYA POLYWOOD LIMITED vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Gujarat High Court | Apr 27, 2022)

1 By this writ application under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the writ applicant has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) to quash and set aside the Notice issued by the respondent No.3 under Section 129(3) of the CGST Act in Form GST MOV-07 dated 12/04/2022 (Annexure-A) (b) to quash and set aside the order of detention passed by the respondent No.3 under Section 129(1) of the CGST Act in Form GST MOV-06 dated 12/04/2022 (Annexure – A1) (c) pending the a...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The Court : - This intra Court appeal by the department of CGST and Central Excise is directed against the order dated 16th March, 2020 in WPO 240 of 2019. The respondents/writ petitioners approached this Court with a prayer to allow the writ petitioners to file/upload in GST TRAN-I form and intended to file TRAN-I form and/or revised TRAN-I form. The learned Single Bench directed the GST and authorities to open the portal for the writ petitioners till March 31, 2020. Aggrieved by such di...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Junior Standing Counsel for the respondent. 2. The petitioner's group of Companies had allegedly suffered loss in one of its centre to an extent of ₹ 50,00,00,000/- as a result of which the petitioner was unable to discharge tax liability under the Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. Under these circumstances, the respondent attached a bank account of the respective petitioner by issuing GST DRC Form, dated 18.02.2022 and 2...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CLR SKILLS TRAINING FOUNDATION (BEEUP SKILLS FOUND..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 27, 2022)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. CLR Skills Training Foundation, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. Whether the reimbursement amount received by the Applicant from Trainer towards “Stipend and other expenses incurred by the Appl...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


23
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).