Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,292 Results

This intra Court appeal is directed against the order dated 9.8.2021 in WPA 5334 of 2021. The appellant had filed the writ petition challenging the order dated 8.11.2019 passed by the respondent cancelling the registration granted in favour of the appellant under the provisions of CGST Act. The appellant sought for interim order which was not granted by the writ Court and direction was issued to file affidavit-in-opposition by 9th November, 2021 and reply, if any, thereto by 24th November, 20...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Challenge in this writ appeal is to the legality, validity and propriety of the order dated 1.10.2021 passed by the learned Single Judge in WPCR No.469/2021 dismissing the said writ petition filed against the order dated 26.6.2021 passed by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Raipur in Criminal Revision No.62/2021 by which the revisional Court affirmed the order dated 12.5.2021 of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Raipur rejecting the application filed by the appellants/petitioners under Section ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. This intra Court appeal is directed against the order dated 22nd November, 2021 in W.P.A. No.15695 of 2021. The appellants /writ petitioners challenged the jurisdiction of the 7th respondent, the Sr. Audit Officer / SSCA-FAP-4 in issuing two communications both dated 22nd March, 2021 enclosing a memo called as “spot memo”. The appellants questioned the action of the 7th respondent in the writ petition, firstly, on the ground that there is no jurisdiction for the audit departmen...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This writ petition has been filed for a writ of Mandamus to direct the respondents to take actions as maybe necessary, including re-opening the common portal so as to enable the petitioner to submit the Form GST TRAN-1 electronically or to permit the petitioner to manually submit Form GST-TRAN-1 and accept the same as being in compliance with the provisions of section 140 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/Section 140 of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act 2017 read with ru...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking for the following reliefs: (i) issue a writ or order or direction setting aside the impugned demand notice vide Annexure A7 dated 13.06.2018 issued by the respondents. (ii) issue a writ of prohibition or order or direction to the respondents not to meddle with the advertisement displays and hoardings of the petitioners. 2. Petitioner No.1 is a registered association of the advertising agencies and petitioner Nos.2 to 6 are the membe...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MEDREICH LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Apr 21, 2022)

M/s. Medreich Limited, # 128, ‘Medreich House', Saraswathi Ammal Street, Maruthi Seva Nagar, Bengaluru-560033, having GSTIN 29AABCM1458Q1ZW, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules, 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5000/- each under the CGST Act, KGST Act. 2. The applicant, engaged in the manufacture of pharmaceutical...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

IBI GROUP INDIA PVT. LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Apr 21, 2022)

M/s. IBI Group India Pvt. Ltd., # 241, 3, 6th Cross, 15t Stage, Binnimangala, Indiranagar, Bengaluru-560038, having GSTIN 29AABCI5556K1Z5, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules, 2017 and Section 97 of KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of KGST Rules, 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CGST Act, KGST Act. 2. IBI Group India Private Limited (“IBI India”), i...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KEYSIGHT TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PVT. LTD


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Karnataka | Apr 21, 2022)

M/S. Keysight Technologies India Pvt. Ltd, ‘The Millenia', II Floor, Tower 'D', # 1 & 2, Murphy Road, Ulsoor, Bengaluru-560 048, having GSTIN number 29AAFCK4584R1ZJ, have filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act,2017 & KGST Act, 2017 read with Rule 104 of CGST Rules 2017 & KGST Rules 2017, in form GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of ₹ 5,000/- each under the CGST Act and the KGST Act. 2. The Applicant is a Private Limited Company, r...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ROMELL REAL ESTATE PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 21, 2022)

The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Romell Real Estate Private Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. a. Whether Entry No. 3(v) (da) of Notification 11/2017-C.T.(R) dated 28/06/2017, as amended time to time, applies to the works cont...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CRYSTAL CROP PROTECTION LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Apr 21, 2022)

The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Crystal Crop Protection Limited, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following question. 1. Whether the transaction of transfer of business by way of merger of two GST registrations/ distinct persons would constit...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


23
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).