Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

MANU TRACTORS vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 24, 2022)

Heard Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned standing counsel for the State - respondents. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs : "i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned orders dated 8.2.22, 21.4.22, 20.04.22, 17.1.22, and 17.1.22 for the period Feb-Mar20, Apr-Nov 20, Mar 21, June 21 and July 21 passed under Section 74(9) of the GST Act; ii Issue a writ, order or dir...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondent and learned counsel for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. This writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:- i) Issue a writ or direction or pass an order in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned show cause notice in GST Mov-6 & MOV-07 dated 29.04.2022, issued by the Assistant Commissioner, Mobile Squad-2, Sector-3, Commercial Tax, Meerut, i.e., th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

INDIAN INSTITUTE OF CORPORATE AFFAIRS


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Delhi | May 23, 2022)

1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST, Act 2017 and DGST, Act 2017 are part materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean reference to the corresponding similar provisions in the DGST Act. 2. The present appeal has been filed under section 100 of the Central Good...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ROD RETAIL PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Delhi | May 23, 2022)

At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST, Act 2017 and DGST, Act 2017 are pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean reference to the corresponding similar provisions in the DGST Act. 2. The present appeal has been filed under section 100 of the Central Goods a...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DEEPAK & CO


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Delhi | May 23, 2022)

1.. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST, Act 2017 and DGST, Act 2017 are pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean reference to the corresponding similar provisions in the DGST Act. 2. The present appeal has been filed under section 100 of the Central Goo...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, CGST & C. EX. DIVISION-II, AG.. vs. GOLDEN TOBIE PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | May 23, 2022)

(Proceedings under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Uttar Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017) The present appeal has been filed under Section 100 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 and Uttar Pradesh Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and UPGST Act”) by Deputy Commissioner, CGST & C. Ex. Division-II, Agra Commissionerate (hereinafter referred to as the “Appellant”) against the&...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BARODA MEDICARE PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | May 23, 2022)

The appellant, M/s. Baroda Medicare Private Limited is running 3 multi- specialty hospitals under the Brand name ‘Sunshine Global Hospitals’ at Manjalpur, Vadodara and Surat. 2. The appellant filed an application for advance ruling before the Gujarat Authority for Advance Ruling (herein after referred to as the ‘GAAR’), wherein it raised the following questions for advance ruling – (i) Whether the supply of medicines, surgical items, implants, consumables...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAHUL RAMCHANDRAN (INSPIRE ACADEMY)


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 23, 2022)

(Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) GST-ARA-43/2020-21/B-64, Dated 23rd May, 2022 The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as "the CGST Act and MGST Act" respectively] by M/s. Rahul Ramchandran the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the f...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SARDARI LAL vs. UT OF J&K AND OTHERS


(Jammu and Kashmir High Court | May 21, 2022)

The petitioner-Sardari Lal is the owner and driver of the vehicle, which was seized by the respondent-authorities. The vehicle had been seized on 5.3.2019. A prayer has been made for release of the said vehicle stating that the petitioner is suffering losses and is unable to make his both ends meet. Counsel for the petitioner, however, states that the vehicle has been confiscated, however, the order of confiscation has not been specifically served upon the petitioner. It was submitted tha...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NBCC (INDIA) LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Odisha | May 20, 2022)

Subject:- M/s NBCC (INDIA) Limited, NBCC Imperia, Mouza-Gadakana, Near Govt. Colony, Press Chhak, Bhubaneswar Odisha, 751017 (here in-after referred to as the ‘Applicant') having GSTIN 21AAACN3053B1ZC, a Limited Company has filed an application for Advance Ruling under Section 97 of CGST Act, 2017 and Section 97 of the OGST Act, 2017 in FORM GST ARA-01 discharging the fee of Rs. 5,000/- each under the CGST Act and the SGST Act. 1.0 The Advance Ruling is sought on the questi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
24
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).