Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,306 Results

AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, CHAUDHARY CHARAN SING..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | May 13, 2022)

ORDER UNDER SECTION 98(4) OF THE CGST ACT, 2017 & UNDER SECTION 98 (4) OF THE UPGST ACT, 2017 1. M/s AIRPORTS AUTHORITY OF INDIA, CHAUDHARY CHARAN SINGH INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, AMAUSI, LUCKNOW-226009 (here in after referred to as the applicant) is a registered assessee under GSTN: 09AAACA6412D1Z6. 2. The applicant has filed application for advance ruling in Form ARA-01 and submitted as under- (1) Airports Authority of India (the ‘AAI') is the authority created under t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING AND OTHER vs. DLF LIMITED


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | May 13, 2022)

The present Report dated 16.12.2021 has been received from the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation in accordance with Rule 129(6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the Sh. Sudhir Jain had filed an application under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017 alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of purchase of flat no. J-062, Tower-J, 6th Floor in the Respondent’s Project “The ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The present Report dated 27.08.2020, was received on 31.08.2020 from the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation under Rule 133(5) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the present case are that the DGAP, upon receipt of a reference from the Standing Committee on Anti-Profiteering, wherein it was alleged by Sh. Vasantbhai Bhikabhai Patel, 202, Shree Shakti Tower, Near Eiffiel Tower, L H Road, Surat- 395006 that the Re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VISHAL GARG, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERING.. vs. JMD LIMITED


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | May 13, 2022)

The present Report dated 26.08.2021 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation, under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed an application under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 against the Respondent alleging profiteering in respect of construction service supplied by him. The Applicant No. 1 had stated t...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NAIMUNNISHA NADEALI SAIYED (LEGAL NAME) , STAR ENT..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | May 13, 2022)

The applicant, M/s. Star Enterprise, seeks Ruling on GST rate of Air Circulation Fans supplied mainly to Poultry House for the purpose of providing ventilation to live stock and that few fans are supplied in Industry. The applicant has submitted the technical Specification of Products; a Sales Invoice and a brochure. Question on which Advance Ruling sought. 2. Which Tax rate shall be applicable on Fans (HSN-84145930) used in Poultry House for the purpose of Air circulation? Person...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Heard. Instant petition has been filed praying for the following main reliefs:- "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari quashing the impugned order dated 29.03.2022 passed by opposite party no. 2 i.e. Additional Commissioner Grade 2 Commercial Tax, Ayodhya in Appeal No. 55 of 2021 U.P Goods and Service Tax Rules, 2017 Rule 9(4) year 2021-2022, in the interest of justice contained as ANNEXURE NO.1 to this writ petition. (ii) Issue a writ, order or dir...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM No.22921/2022 1. Allowed, subject to just exceptions. W.P.(C) 7504/2022 2. Issue notice to the respondents. 2.1 Mr. Harpreet Singh accepts notice on behalf of the respondents. 3. The principal grievance of the petitioner-company is that its bank account maintained at ICICI Bank, Janpath, New Delhi, has been provisionally attached. 3.1 It is not disputed by Mr. Singh that the provisional attachment order dated 13.10.2021 has been effected under Section 83 of the Cent...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner has filed this petition while praying for following reliefs:- “(i) This Hon’ble court may kindly be pleased to call for the records of the case below; (ii) This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to setaside the impugned order dated 19.08.2019 (Annexure P/4) passed by Respondent No.1. (iii) This Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to setaside the impugned order dated 28.05.2019 (Annex.P/2) passed by Respondent No.2. (iv) Any other approp...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. A Report dated 26.11.2020 had been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 filed application before the National Anti- profiteering Authority under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 with respect to supply of “Sevices by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography film...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present Report dated 27.11.2020 has been received from the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation, under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case are that the Applicant No. 1 had filed an application under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 against the Respondent alleging profiteering in respect of construction service supplied by him. The Applicant No. 1 had state...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
24
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).