Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

1. The present Report dated 28.09.2020 has been received from Applicant No. 2, i.e. Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP), after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules 2017, which arose from an application filed by Applicant No. 1 under Rule 128 of the CGST Rules, 2017, alleging profiteering by the Respondent in respect of the supply of “Services by way of admission to exhibition of cinematography films”. Applicant No. 1 ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JIGAR R. SHAH, DIRECTOR GENERAL OF ANTI-PROFITEERI.. vs. JAY AMBE DEVELOPERS


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | May 27, 2022)

1. Present Report dated 25.03.2021 had been furnished by the Applicant No. 2 i.e. the Director General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) after a detailed investigation, under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The Applicant No. 1 had filed an application under Rule 128 (1) of the CGST Rules, 2017 against the Respondent alleging profiteering in respect of construction service supplied by him. The Applicant No. 1 had stated that he had purchased a flat in the Resp...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Mr.Richardson Wilson, learned Additional Government Pleader takes notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. The issue pertains to the cancellation of GST registration. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner was issued with a Show Cause Notice dated 19.12.2018, to show cause as to why the registration granted to the petitioner should not be cancelled for non-filing of statutory returns under the provisions of the respective GST Acts. 3. It appears that the petitioner had als...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Assessee under the GST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'Act') prays for issuance of a writ in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the order dated 15.05.2019 (Annexure P-4), whereby his registration under the Act has been cancelled and that action of the respondents dated 09.04.2022 (Annexure P-5), whereby his appeal preferred against the order dated 15.05.2019 has been rejected without even entertaining the same. 2. As per the petitioner, he was a Contractor under M/s. ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This writ appeal has been directed against the order passed by the Writ Court/learned Single Judge, dated 25.04.2022, made in W.P(MD)No. 7880 of 2022. 2.In the said writ petition, the proceedings issued by the revenue in Form GST DRC-16, dated 20.11.2021 to attach the property of the writ petitioner was under challenge. 3.Considering the said challenge and the grounds raised by the writ petitioner in support of the challenge, the learned Judge of this Court by the impugned order havin...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KISHORE KUMAR ARORA vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Delhi High Court | May 26, 2022)

1. This writ petition is directed against the show cause notice dated 21.02.2020, as also the Order-in-Original dated 16.10.2020 and the Order-in-Appeal dated 03.08.2021. 2. The narrow issue which arises for consideration in this matter is, whether respondent no. 2 had jurisdiction to issue the impugned show cause notice. 3. Mr J.K. Mittal, learned counsel, who appears on behalf of the petitioner, submits that the record would show that even according to respondent no.2, the petitione...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MH ECOLIFE E-MOBILITY PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 25, 2022)

(Under Section 102 & 104 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act/ Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act. 2017) 1. An application, for Advance Ruling was filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. MH Ecolife E-Mobility Pvt. Ltd., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of certain questions as ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AUTO CLUSTER DEVELOPMENT AND RESEARCH INSTITUTE


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 25, 2022)

(Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 thereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively j by M/s. Auto Cluster Development and Research Institute, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questio...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NAVI MUMBAI SPORTS ASSOCIATION


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 25, 2022)

(Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Navi Mumbai Sports Association, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. Whether...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
This writ petition has come to be filed by the petitioner, namely, Progressive Enterprise which was under contract with the private company under which the petitioner was transporting, installing and commissioning telecommunication materials throughout the State of Tripura. One such consignment containing 2(two) tax invoices, namely, vide No.312341823000561 valued at Rs.3,14,616.73/- dated 13.04.2022 and vide No.312341823000578 valued at Rs.12,53,941.83/- dated 13.04.2022 had been generated a...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
24
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).