Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,315 Results

MONALISA CO-OPERATIVE HOUSING SOCIETY LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | May 31, 2022)

(Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The present application has been filed under Section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act” respectively] by M/s. Monalisa Co-Operative Housing Society Limited., the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAJNANDINI METAL LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | May 31, 2022)

Aggrieved by the action of the respondents of blocking his Input Tax Credit by proceeding under Rule 86A of the Central Goods and Services Tax Rules, 2017 (for short, the CGST Rules), the petitioner has approached this Court seeking quashing of the order dated 17th of December, 2021 (Annexure P-18). 2. The petitioner, a Public Limited Company is engaged in manufacturing of copper wire rod and submersible winding wire and is registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017.As ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Heard Sri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel for the assessee and Sri K.R. Singh, learned Chief Standing Counsel alongwith Sri Jagdish Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the revenue. 2. Present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the order dated 22.11.2021 passed by the Appeal Authority; the order dated 09.02.2018 passed by the respondent no.4 under Section 129(3) of the U.P. GST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') and; notice dated 07.12.2019 issued by ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ZIGMA GLOBAL ENVIRON SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | May 30, 2022)

ORDER (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST Act, 2017 and SGST Act, 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ANDHRA PRADESH MEDICAL SERVICES AND INFRASTRUCTURE..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | May 30, 2022)

ORDER (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST Act, 2017 and SGST Act, 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a ref...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ANDHRA PRADESH INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE CORPORATI..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | May 30, 2022)

ORDER (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub- section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST Act, 2017 and SGST Act, 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a re...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SRI VINAYAKA HATCHERIES


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | May 30, 2022)

ORDER (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST Act, 2017 and SGST Act, 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisions, a ref...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

UNIVERSAL PRINT SYSTEMS


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Andhra Pradesh | May 30, 2022)

ORDER (Under sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and sub-section (4) of Section 98 of Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) 1. At the outset we would like to make it clear that the provisions of CGST Act, 2017 and SGST Act, 2017 are in pari materia and have the same provisions in like matter and differ from each other only on a few specific provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is particularly made to such dissimilar provisi...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TIME EDUCATION KOLKATA PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | May 30, 2022)

1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a period of six months from the date of the order. Provided that no rectification which has the eff...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Learned counsel for the appellants submits that, in view of the prevalent laws and circumstances of the case, the learned single Judge ought to have granted an interim order directing release of the petitioners’ vehicle on condition of payment of 50% of the value of the goods or 200% tax payable, whichever is higher. It is submitted that, within the contemplation of the amended Section 129 (1)(a) (b) of the West Bengal Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017, even if the owner of the goods ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


  Hide
25
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).