Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

RAMANATTU MOTOR CORP. vs. STATE OF KERALA & OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | Feb 20, 2025)

JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges the show cause notice and the consequential order issued under section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/State Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short ‘the GST Act’) imposing tax, interest and penalty. 2. Petitioner is a partnership firm. For the financial year 2018-19, pursuant to a show cause notice dated 16-11-2023 under section 73(1) of the GST Act, an order dated 06-03-2024 was issued, imposing a huge liability. The ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VISHNU SINGH vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Feb 20, 2025)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Shri Rishi Raj Kapoor, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned ACSC for the State - respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed against the impugned order dated 20.03.2024 passed by the respondent no. 2 as well as the impugned order dated 04.09.2023 passed by the respondent no. 3 under section 129(3) of the GST Act. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is a Proprietorship firm engage...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner was served by an assessment order, dated 11.12.2023, passed by the 1st respondent, under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 [for short “the GST Act”] for the period 2017-18 to 2021-22, this order has been challenged by the petitioner. 2. This assessment order, in Form GST DRC-07, is challenged by the petitioner, on various grounds, including the ground that ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PVR INFRA PROJECTS vs. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER AND OTHERS


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | Feb 19, 2025)

ORDER The Court made the following: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner was served with an assessment order in Form GST DRC- 07, dated 09.03.2022, passed by the 1st respondent, under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 [for short “the GST Act”], for the period 2017 to 2018. This order has been challenged by the petitioner in the present writ petition. 2. This assessment order, in Form GST DRC-07, is challenged by the petitioner, on var...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The Court made the following order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner was served with an assessment order, dated 06.06.2024 passed by the 1st respondent, under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 [for short “the GST Act”] for the period 2017 to 2018. This order has been challenged by the petitioner. 2. This assessment order, in Form GST DRC-07, is challenged by the petitioner, on various grounds, including the ground that the s...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The Court made the following Order: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner was served with notices for assessment, for the period 2017-2021, by the State GST Authorities as well as the Central GST Authorities being the Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence. 2. The petitioner being aggrieved by the simultaneous service of notices, both by the State and the Central Government, has approached this Court, by way of the present ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The Court made the following: (per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner was served by an assessment order, dated 18.07.2023, passed by the 1st respondent, under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 [for short “the GST Act”] for the period April, 2021 to March, 2022, this order has been challenged by the petitioner. 2. This assessment order, in Form GST DRC-07, is challenged by the petitioner, on various grounds, including the ground tha...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL ORDER The petitioner is before this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, questioning Annexure-B, Order bearing No. MYS-SPP-ADC/JC(A)-090-2022-23-GST dated 29.12.2022 passed by respondent No. 2-Appellate Authority, by which the petitioner’s appeal is rejected solely on the ground that the statutory deposit of 10% is not deposited along with appeal. 2. Heard Smt. R. Prathibha and Sri. S. Parthasarathi, learned counsels for the petitioner and Sri. Aravind. V. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Challenging the refund rejection order issued in Form GST RFD-06 dated 25th September, 2024, the instant writ petition has been filed. 2. The petitioner no. 1 claims to be engaged in the business of manufacture and supply of ferro alloys and also claims to have exported goods to foreign territory from time to time. It is the petitioners’ case, in terms of Rule 96 of CGST/WBGST/IGST Rules, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the said Rules), the petitioner no.1 is entitled to refund ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The Court made the following : ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice R. Raghunandan Rao) The petitioner was served with an assessment order in Form GST DRC-07, dated 12.08.2024, passed by the 2nd respondent, under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 [for short “the GST Act”], for the period 2019 to 2020. This order has been challenged by the petitioner in the present writ petition. 2. This assessment order, in Form GST DRC-07, is challenged by the petitioner, on variou...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)