Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

ORDER 1. This writ petition has been preferred seeking the following reliefs : - “i) Issue a writ of certiorari or writ in the nature of certiorari quashing the Impugned Order, dated 29.04.2024, bearing Order Reference No. ZD0704240668370 passed by the Respondent No 3. ii) To issue appropriate writ in the nature of certiorari or directions/order quashing the Impugned Show Cause Notice dated 30.12.2023 as the same is bad in law, against the principles of natural justice and c...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT ARINDAM SINHA, ACJ. 1. Mr. Das, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client had filed petition dated 4th September, 2024 seeking passing of order in Form GST MOV-09. The truck carrying consignment was detained on 5th July, 2024. There was urgency for his client to conclude the consignment. Hence on 5th July, 2024 itself his client paid Rs. 5,37,656/- and got released the truck. However, the detention was illegal. There was no order made within a p...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.) 1. We have heard Mr. Vinay Kumar Shraff, learned advocate for the appellant and Mr. T.M. Siddique, learned senior advocate appearing for the State, assisted by Mr. Tanoy Chakraborty, learned advocate. 2. This intra-Court appeal by the writ petitioner is directed against the order dated February 10, 2025 in W.P.A. 2401 of 2025. In the said writ petition, the appellant/writ petitioner had challenged the adjudication order dated July 19, 2024 on three...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BITUPAN DOLEY vs. THE STATE OF ASSAM & OTHERS


(Gauhati High Court | Feb 18, 2025)

ORDER PER Heard Mr. R.S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Finance & Taxation Department for all the respondents. 2. The petitioner has stated that he is in the business of execution of works contracts and carries out business in the name of his proprietorship concern, M/s Bitupan Doley. For the purpose of carrying the business, the petitioner had registered himself under the Goods and Services Tax [GST] vide Registration no...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER Heard Mr. R.S. Mishra, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. B. Choudhury, learned Standing Counsel, Finance & Taxation Department for all the respondents. 2. The petitioner has stated that he used to deal in the business of supply and installation & commissioning, of engineering / scientific laboratory equipments etc. and carriers on such business in the name and style of his sole proprietorship concern, M/s Maverick Technologies from its principal place of bus...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 23.04.2024 passed by the 1st respondent. 2. Mr. T.N.C. Kaushik, learned Additional Government Pleader, takes notice on behalf of the respondent. By consent of the parties, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that in this case, the petitioner had entrusted a Consultant for filing reply to the show cause notice...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Per : Justice Vivek Rusia Petitioner has filed this present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the show-cause notice dated 31.12.2024 issued by the Additional Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise/respondent No. 2. Petitioner is also challenging the constitutional validity of Section 16(2)(c) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as 'CGST of Act') as unconstitutional and ultra vires of Articles 14, 19(...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

S.P. FABRICREATORS vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Feb 18, 2025)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 2. By means of instant writ petition, the following prayer has been made: "(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of certiorari, quashing the impugned order dated 19.05.2018 passed in Appeal No.41/2018 passed by respondent no.3, U/s 129(3) of the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017 (Annexure No.8 of this writ petition); (ii) Issue a writ, order or dir...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER ( Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul ) Sri G.Narendra Chetty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC for respondent No.1. 2. Regard being had to the similitude of the orders impugned herein, these writ petitions were analogously heard on admission. 3. The facts are taken from W.P.No.36631 of 2024. This writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India takes exception t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JAIN DISTRIBUTORS vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Feb 18, 2025)

ORDER HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondent and perused the material available on record. 2. The instructions produced by the learned Standing Counsel are taken on record. 3. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner challenging the order dated 04.04.2024 passed under Section 73 of the G.S.T. Act whereby the demand was confirmed. 4. The neat contention of the counsel for the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)