Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,903 Results

NAVYA NUCHU


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 20, 2025)

(Passed under Section 101 (1) of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) PREAMBLE 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the appellant within a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VAISHNAOI INFRATECH AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 20, 2025)

(Passed under Section 101 (1) of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) PREAMBLE 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GEEKAY WIRES LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 20, 2025)

(Passed under Section 101 (1) of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) PREAMBLE 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate Authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate Authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the appellant within a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DUET INDIA HOTELS (HYDERABAD) PRIVATE LIMITED.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 20, 2025)

(Passed under Section 101 (1) of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) PREAMBLE 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TELANGANA STATE TECHNOLOGY SERVICES LIMITED.


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 20, 2025)

PREAMBLE 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the appellant within a period of six months from the date of the order. Provided that, no rectification whi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KIRBY BUILDING SYSTEMS & STRUCTURES INDIA PRIVATE ..


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 20, 2025)

PREAMBLE 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the appellant within a period of six months from the date of the order. Provided that, no rectification whi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ALUDECOR LAMINATION PRIVATE LIMITED


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Telangana | Feb 20, 2025)

(Passed under Section 101 (1) of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) PREAMBLE 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Telangana Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (TGST Act, 2017 or the Act), this Order may be amended by the Appellate Authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate Authority on its own accord, or is brought to its notice by the concerned officer, the jurisdictional officer or the applicant within a...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER This Writ petition has been filed by the petitioner/taxpayer, who is registered dealer on the files of the respondent-Department under the provisions of the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (GST Act)/ Central Goods and Services Tax Act (CGST Act) as the case may be, challenging the orders passed by the respondent-Department, whereby, their claim of ITC was reversed/negatived and consequently, the petitioners have been directed to pay tax/penalty/interest. 2. When this Writ Pe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SAHITHI MARKETERS vs. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL TAX


(Telangana High Court | Feb 20, 2025)

ORDER ( Per the Hon’ble the Acting Chief Justice Sujoy Paul ) Sri Mohammed Rafi, learned counsel representing Sri Shaik Jeelani Basha, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC, for respondent Nos.1 and 3. 2. Heard on admission. 3. The petitioner takes exception to the summary of the order in Form GST DRC-07, dated 03.05.2024, and the Order-in Original (O.I.O.) dated 24.04.2024 (Ex.P.2). 4. Learne...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT Petitioner challenges Exhibit-P3 notice and also seeks for a direction to provisionally return the gold seized, pursuant to Exhibit-P1 on the basis of a bank guarantee and bond to be furnished by him. 2. Petitioner claims to be a traditional goldsmith originally hailing from Maharashtra. According to him, 20 years back, he came to Kerala as an ‘immigrant job seeker’ and along with his brothers, is now carrying on job work of melting, cutting, polishing and purific...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


24
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
24 Apr

☑ Quarterly | GSTR-3B

GSTR-3B for the Quarter Jan - Mar 2025 (QRMP Taxpayers < 5 Cr - Rule 61) - Category II States.  

* State Category II - Himachal Pradesh, Punjab, Uttarakhand, Haryana, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar, Sikkim, Arunachal Pradesh, Nagaland, Manipur, Mizoram, Tripura, Meghalaya, Assam, West Bengal, Jharkhand or Odisha or the Union territories of Jammu and Kashmir, Ladakh, Chandigarh and Delhi.

25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)