Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

ENKAY POLYMERS vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 16, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard Sri Praveen Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated July 03, 2023 passed by the respondent No.2/Additional Commissioner, Grade-2 (Appeal)-IV, State Tax Ghaziabad rejecting the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

HAJABANDENAWAS PARTNER vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER


(Madras High Court | May 15, 2024)

ORDER This Writ Petition is filed challenging the order passed by the respondent dated 12.10.2023 vide proceedings in GSTIN/33AADFH2833D1ZY/2019-20, dated 12.10.2023. 2. The case of the petitioner is that originally the Form GST ASMT- 10 notice was issued on 16.08.2023 and again Form GST DRC-01 was also sent to the petitioner on 22.09.2023, by mentioning the date of personal hearing on 10.10.2023. The facts arising out of this writ petition is that there is a mismatch with regard to t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GPS AUTOMOBILES PVT. LTD vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Rajasthan High Court | May 15, 2024)

ORDER 1. By this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner seeks to assail the correctness and validity of notice dated 08.02.2020 by which GST-interest liability on account of delay in payment of GST has been issued. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the aforesaid notice has been issued on a pre-judged determination of interest liability without affording any opportunity of hearing. 3. We find that the notice was issued against ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard Sri Atul Gupta, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Nimai Das, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Challenge has been raised to the adjudication order dated 27.04.2024 imposing penalty under Section 129(1)(a) of the U.P. GST Act, 2017. 3. At the outset, a preliminary objection has been raised by Sri Nimai Das, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents as to availability of statutory alternative rem...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MOHIT KUMAR vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 15, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE MOHD. FAIZ ALAM KHAN, J. 1. Heard Shri S.C. Mishra, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Shri Mukesh Kumar Tewari, Advocate, appearing for the accused-applicant -Mohit Kumar as well as Shri Dipak Seth, along with Shri Digvijay Nath Dubey, learned counsels appearing for the respondent- Union of India (Department of Revenue, Directorate of GST Intelligence, Lucknow Zonal Unit), and perused the record. 2. This bail application has been moved by the accused-appli...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the orders dated 30th June 2023 and 19th September, 2023 both passed under Sections 107 of the GST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”). 2. It is the petitioner’s case that it carries on business in the name and style of M/s R.S. Steel Company and in usual course of business dealings and transactions had been supplying goods from its registered place of business. When the petitioner was...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AMAR GENERAL STORE vs. THE STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 15, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard Sri Vishwjit, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shankar Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner challenges the order in original for cancellation of registration dated February 22, 2023 passed by the respondent No.3/Assistant Commissioner, State Tax, Kosikalan, Mathura and the order dated April 4, 2...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following. Delay condoned. Having heard learned counsel for the petitioner(s), we are not inclined to interfere in the matter. The Special Leave Petitions are hence dismissed. Pending application(s) shall stand disposed of. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NECTAR LIFE SCIENCES LTD. vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | May 14, 2024)

SANJEEV PRAKASH SHARMA, J.(Oral) In the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed as under:- “(a) Quash the Order-in-Original dated 21.02.2024 (Annexure P-1) passed by Respondent No 3 to the extent it deals with the issue of "wrong availment / passing on of input tax credit" and direct the Respondents to refund INR 13,00,00,000/- paid by the Petitioner (in respect of the above issue) under protest, with interest; (b) Quash the Order-in-Original dated 21.02.2...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. A.K. Mohanty, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. T.K. Satapathy, learned Senior Standing Counsel, GST, Central Tax and Customs appearing for the opposite parties. 3. The petitioner has filed this writ petition challenging the orders passed by the authority under Annexures-1, 5 and 6 on the ground that without taking into consideration the overlapping period, the demand has been raised. 4. Mr. A.K. Mohanty,...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)