Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,922 Results

JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 24.04.2024 whereby the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 10.12.2023, proposing a demand of Rs. 2,92,00,063.00 against the petitioner had been disposed of and a demand including penalty has been created against the petitioner. The order has been passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). 2. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appea...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VIKAS VARYANI vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 17, 2024)

ORDER 1. Heard Shri Yashonidhi Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Ankur Agarawal, learned Standing Counsel for the revenue. 2. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 31.12.2023 passed by the adjudicating authority under Section 73 of the U.P.G.S.T. Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act') for the period 1.7.2017 to 31.3.2018. The petitioner was visited with the show cause notice dated 30.9.2023. Amongst others, it was alleged as below : ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J. (ORAL) 1. Petitioner impugns order dated 12.12.2023 whereby the impugned Show Cause Notice dated 29.09.2023 proposing a demand of Rs. 9,04,200.00/- against the petitioner had been disposed of and demand including penalty has been raised against the petitioner. The order has been passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the Act). 2. Learned counsel for Petitioner submits that the Show Cause Not...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BHAIYALAL CONTRACTORS vs. STATE OF UP AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 17, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard Sri Ajay Kumar Yadav, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State respondents. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the writ petitioner is aggrieved by the appellate order dated June 3, 2024 whereby the appeal of the petitioner was rejected by way of Form GST APL - 02 stating t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

LOTUS INDUSTRIES vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Gauhati High Court | May 16, 2024)

ORDER Heard Ms M L Gope, learned counsel for the petitioners. Also heard Mr S C Keyal, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the GST Department. 2. Mr S C Keyal, learned Senior Standing Counsel for the GST Department, fairly submits that the issue involved in this writ petition is squarely covered by the decision rendered by the Apex Court in the case of Union of India & Another –Vs- M/s VVF Limited and Another; reported in (2020) 20 SCC 57. 3. Ms M L Gope, learned counsel...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking multifarious reliefs. 2. The petitioner essentially is desirous of availing statutory remedy of appeal against the impugned orders before the Appellate Tribunal (hereinafter referred to as "Tribunal") under Section 112 of the Bihar Goods and Services Tax Act (here in after referred to as "B.G.S.T. Act"). 3. However,...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. Challenging the adjudication order dated 5th September, 2023, passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017/West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), issued in Form DRC-07, an appeal was filed before the Appellate Authority on 6th February, 2024. Admittedly, the said appeal was barred by limitation. 3. Pursuant to a show cause dated ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PRAHLAD RAI VIJAY KUMAR vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | May 16, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. 1. Heard Sri Vishwjit. learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Ravi Shankar Pandey, learned Additional Standing Counsel for the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the order imposing tax and penalty dated February 27, 2020 and the order passed in Appeal dated November 27, 2020. 3. Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT JOYMALYA BAGCHI, J. :- 1. Learned Advocate for the appellant submits that the learned Judge failed to take into consideration the fact that relevant documents submitted by the appellant had not been considered by the Principal Commissioner, CGST, Bolpur Commissionerate. 2. We have gone through the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge as well as the papers annexed to the stay application. Learned Single Judge opined appellant had been given adequate opportunit...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Heard Shri Alok Yadav, Advocate holding brief of learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Nimai Dass, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. Challenge has been raised to the order dated 19.08.2021 passed by the Deputy Commissioner, Commercial Tax Department, Sikandrabad, Bulandshahar, under Section 74(9) of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the 'Act'). 3. At the very outset, learned Additional...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


25
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 Apr

☑ Half-Yearly | ITC-04

ITC-04 for the half year (Oct - Mar 2025) (For taxpayers > 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

☑ Annual | ITC-04

ITC-04 for complete FY 2024-25 (For taxpayers <= 5 Cr. Turnover) - Rule 45.

28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)