^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

BALAJI SHIPPING vs. UNION OF INDIA KISHANGARH & OTHERS
(Rajasthan High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

AVNEESH JHINGAN
ASHUTOSH KUMAR

Pet. Counsel

Ravi Gupta

Res. Counsel

Sandeep Taneja

Kinjal Surana

Petitioner / Applicant	BALAJI SHIPPING
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA KISHANGARH & OTHERS
Court	Rajasthan High Court
State	Rajasthan
Date	Jul 11, 2024
Order No.	D. B. Civil Writ Petition No. 9010, 9071/2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 11326
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
Order AVNEESH JHINGAN, J (ORAL):- 1. These two petitions are being disposed of by this common order as the facts and issues involved are similar. For convenience, the facts are being taken from D.B. Civil Writ Petition No.9071/2024. 2. This petition is filed aggrieved of order dated 21.02.2024 dismissing the appeal of the petitioner as time barred. 3. The brief facts are that a demand against the petitioner was created vide order dated 24.08.2023. As per the petitioner, the appeal was preferred online on 22.11.2023. The Appellate Authority recorded a finding that the appeal was filed on 29.11.2023 and dismissed the appeal as time barred. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the appeal was filed within limitation. Alternatively, the Appellate Authority had power to condone the delay up to thirty days. No opportunity was granted to the petitioner for seeking condonation of delay, if any. 5. Learned counsel for the respondent defends the impugned o....