^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

SEOYON E-HWA SUMMIT AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PVT. LTD. vs. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) -1 CHENNAI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SENTHILKUMAR RAMAMOORTHY

Pet. Counsel

P.v.sudakar

Res. Counsel

C. Harha Raj

Petitioner / Applicant	SEOYON E-HWA SUMMIT AUTOMOTIVE INDIA PVT. LTD.
Respondent	THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER (ST) -1 CHENNAI
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Jul 11, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 18490 of 2024 and W. M. P. Nos. 20268 & 20269 of 2024
Citation	2024(7) TAXREPLY 11286
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER An order in original dated 15.09.2023 is assailed in this writ petition on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. 2. The petitioner received show cause notice dated 13.02.2023 with regard to the mismatch between the petitioner's GSTR 3B returns and the auto-populated GSTR 2A. The petitioner replied there to on 24.03.2023. Upon consideration of the petitioner's reply, it is stated that the proceedings were dropped. Meanwhile, it is stated that another show cause notice dated 27.07.2023 was issued to the petitioner in respect of the mismatch between the petitioner's GSTR 9 return and the auto-populated GSTR 2A. On account of not being aware of the same, it is stated that the petitioner could not participate in proceedings culminating in the order impugned herein. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the impugned order would be liable to be reconsidered in view of the earlier ....