Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,950 Results

ORDER PER HON’BLE SP, J. Heard Sri Praveen K Nair, learned counsel for the petitioner; Ms.B.Sapna Reddy, learned Junior Standing Counsel for Income Tax Department, for respondent Nos.1 and 2; and Sri B.Mukherjee, learned counsel representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.3. 2. With the consent, finally heard. 3. This petition is directed against the impugned Order-in-Original, dated 14.09.2023. Learned counsel for th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents accepts notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition impugning a Show Cause Notice dated 14.06.2022 (hereafter the impugned SCN) calling upon the petitioner to show cause as to why its GST Registration (GSTIN: 07AATFS9380G1ZG) not be cancelled. The reason stated in the impugned SCN for the then proposed action is set out below: “1 VISITED AT REGISTERED ADDRESS FOR PH...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER By this common order, all these Writ Petitions are taken up for dismissal. 2. In these Writ Petitions, the petitioner has challenged the respective assessment orders dated 16.05.2023 bearing reference No.33AEIPR7002M1ZC for the respective assessment years as detailed below: S.No W.P.(MD)No. Assessment Year Tax Rs. Interest Rs. Penalty Rs....
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard learned counsel Sri Rajeev Channappa Nulvi appearing for the petitioner. 2. Learned AGA is directed to take notice for respondents. 3. This petition is filed by the petitioner seeking to quash the order of adjudication under Section 73 (9) read with Section 6 and 50 of the Karnataka Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (for short, ‘the KGST Act, 2017’) dated 30.04.2024 passed by the 2nd respondent vide Annexure-G. The petitioner is a proprietary firm and engage...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J: 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging seven provisional orders of attachment issued under Section 83 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”). These orders include, three several orders dated 3rd February, 2023, two orders dated 10th February, 2023 and two several orders dated 9th February, 20...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SUNIL KUMAR K vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER & OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | Jul 8, 2024)

JUDGMENT DR. A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR, J. The petitioner in WP(C).No. 6240 of 2024 is the appellant herein aggrieved by the judgment dated 20.03.2024 of the learned Single Judge in the Writ Petition. 2. Briefly stated the facts necessary for the disposal of the Writ Appeal are as follows: The appellant who was a dealer under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act/Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Act, (CGST/SGST), 2017 and Rules approached the writ court impugning Ext.P12 as...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

PADHGELWAR SACHIN KUMAR vs. THE UNION OF INDIA


(Telangana High Court | Jul 8, 2024)

ORDER ( Per Hon’ble SP, J ) Heard Sri Ponnam Ashok Goud, learned counsel for the petitioner; Sri B. Mukherjee, learned counsel representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent Nos.1 and 4; Learned Government Pleader for Revenue for respondent No.3 and Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC for respondent No.2. 2. With the consent, finally heard. 3. Challenge mounted in this petition filed under Articl...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) CM APPL.37506/2024 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 9168/2024 3. Issue notice. Learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice. 4. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying that appropriate directions be issued for cancellation of the petitioner’s GST Registration in terms of its application (reference number AA070124043893A dated 16.01.2024). ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. 2. The learned counsel for the respondents accepts notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 04.05.2023 (hereafter the impugned order) passed by respondent no. 2, whereby the petitioner’s Goods and Services Tax (GST) Registration, was cancelled. The petitioner also impugns the Show Cause Notice dated 17.04.2023 (hereafter the impugned SCN) pursuant to which the impugned order was pa...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT   (PER RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J .):- 1. Leave to correct prayer clause C. Correction be carried out forthwith. 2. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally by the consent of the parties. 3. At the outset, two aspects are admitted by the parties. Firstly, that the Deputy Commissioner (Appeals), Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, did not have the jurisdiction to condone the delay caused in filing the GST Appeal and, therefore, the order dated 18.12.2023, cann...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


28
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)