Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,950 Results

JUDGMENT RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J: 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order dated 21st February, 2024, passed by the appellate authority under Section 107 of the Central/West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”). 3. Being aggrieved by an order dated 8th August, 2023, passed under Section 73 of the said Act for the tax p...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT PER RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J: 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is taken on record. 2. The present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order of cancellation of registration of the petitioner passed under the Central/West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”). 3. Records reveal that pursuant to the show cause issued on 6th January, 2023, calling upon the petitioner to show cause as...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice P. SAM KOSHY ) Heard Mr.Venkata Prasad P. learned counsel representing Mr.M.Naga Deepak, learned counsel for the petitioner, Mr.Swaroop Oorilla, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondent Nos.1 & 3, Mr.B.Mukharjee, learned counsel representing Mr.Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India for respondent No.2 and Mr.Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for respondent No.4. Perused the material availab...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 07.03.2024 is challenged in this writ petition on the ground that Input Tax Credit (ITC) reflected in GSTR 2A was not properly taken into consideration. Pursuant to the scrutiny of the petitioner's returns, notice in Form ASMT 10 was issued on 17.08.2023. This was followed by show cause notice dated 19.09.2023. The petitioner replied to such show cause notice on 18.10.2023 and 23.01.2024. The impugned order was issued thereafter. 2. Learned counsel...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAM KRISHNA GUPTA vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jul 9, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Ms. Yashonidhi Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Ravi Shanker Pandey, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State- respondents. 2. By means of present writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the orders dated 20.02.2023 by which the penalty was imposed upon the petitioner as well as order dated 19.10.2022, by which the same was confirmed by the appellate authority on the ground that the Part-B o...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER By this writ petition, the petitioner challenges appellate order dated 30.05.2024 and seeks a consequential direction to the 1st respondent to dispose of the appeal on merits after providing a reasonable opportunity to the petitioner. 2. An order of assessment dated 12.11.2023 was issued ex parte. The petitioner asserts that GST compliances were entrusted to a consultant and that such consultant did not know about the proceedings because the show cause notice and other communica...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CHAUDHARY ASSOCIATES LKO vs. STATE OF U.P. & OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Jul 9, 2024)

ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel who appears on behalf of the State-opposite parties. This petitioner has been filed with the following main prayer:- "I. issue a writ or direction or pass an order in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned ex-parte demand order and show cause notice dated 22.12.2023 and 12.09.2023 (July 2017-March 2018) issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Sector - 9, Lucknow Uttar Pradesh i.e., the respondent n...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The petitioner is before this Court against the impugned order dated 30.11.2023 passed by the respondent for the assessment year 2017-18 to 2021-22. 2. The petitioner has admitted to the tax liability as far as the assessment years 2018-19 and 2019-20 are concerned. The tax amount paid by the petitioner for a sum of Rs. 68,09,076/- has been appropriated in the impugned order towards the tax liability of Rs. 15,47,638/- for the assessment year 2018-19 and Rs. 52,61,438/- for the ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 29.12.2023 is challenged in this writ petition. Upon receipt of show cause notice dated 29.09.2023 relating to about 10 defects, the petitioner submitted replies dated 16.12.2023 and 28.12.2023. The impugned order was issued in these facts and circumstances. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the highest tax proposal, which was confirmed in the impugned order, relates to the mismatch between the taxable turnover reported in GSTR 9 and t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT (T.S. SIVAGNANAM, C.J.) In Re: IA No. CAN 1 of 2024 1. We have heard Mr. Sandip Choraria, learned advocate for the appellants and Mr. K. K. Maiti, learned advocate for the respondent/CGST authority. 2. There is delay of 11 days in filing the appeal. We have perused the affidavit filed in support of the petition and we find that sufficient cause has been shown for not being able to prefer the appeal within the period of limitation. 3. IA No. CAN 1 of 2024 is allowe...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


28
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)