Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,950 Results

ORDER The present Report dated 07.02.2020 has been received from the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) on 12.02.2020 after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case and findings of investigation conducted by the DGAP are as under:- a) A reference has been received from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 28.06.2019, to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an applica...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

FAIVELEY TRANSPORT RAIL TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE..


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jul 10, 2024)

(Passed by Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling under Section 101(1) of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) Preamble 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017/Tamil Nadu Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 (“the Act”, in Short), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate auth...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

R.N. GARG AND SONS vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Delhi High Court | Jul 10, 2024)

ORDER PER CM No.34842/2024 (for exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exception. 2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 8438/2024 3. Issue notice. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents accept notice. 5. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under: “a) Issue a writ of Certiorari, or any other suitable writ, order, or direction, to quash/set aside the impugned order dated 18.04.2024 & also...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER In this writ petition, an appellate order dated 13.03.2024 is assailed. The petitioner had applied for refund under Section 54 of applicable GST enactments. Such application was rejected by order dated 30.08.2022. The petitioner carried the matter in appeal before the appellate authority by presenting such appeal online on 31.10.2022. The time limit for filing such appeal was up to 28.11.2022. On account of the hard copy of the appeal being submitted on 02.08.2023, the appeal was re...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondents. 2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order dated 12.08.2023 passed by the second respondent for the assessment year 2018-19 bearing reference in GSTIN. 33AGDPR8077R1Z1. 3. By the impugned order, the demand, that was proposed in DRC 01 dated 29.04.2024, has been confirmed. The impugned order records that the petitioner has neither replied to the show cause notice n...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER: In all these cases, the petitioners, who are registered dealers, running oil mills, had been served with notices of demand by the respective Assessing Officers, raising demands over and above the taxes paid by the petitioners. Aggrieved by the said orders, the petitioners had approached the Appellate Authority, which is the 2nd respondent-Additional Commissioner (Sales Tax), Appellate Authority, Tirupati. The appeals filed by the petitioners are as follows: ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO) The petitioner has registered a dealer under the Goods and Service Tax Act, 2017 with effect from 21.08.2018 in the Addanki Circle and thereafter, the registration was transferred to Bapatla Circle, Guntur-II Division. The petitioner who was earlier doing business in granite slabs or blocks had subsequently cancelled his registration with effect from 30.09.2019. At the time of cancellation, which was accepted by the department, n...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J: 1. the present writ petition has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order dated 30th April, 2024, passed by the appellate authority under Section 107 of the Central/West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), whereby the petitioner’s appeal had been rejected on the ground that the same was barred by limitation. The facts are not in dispute. In connection with a proceeding initiated un...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, impugning an order dated 08.04.2024 (hereafter the impugned order) passed under Section 73 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter the CGST Act) pursuant to the show cause notice dated 10.12.2023 (hereafter the impugned SCN). 2. The petitioner claims that the impugned SCN was not received and therefore she neither filed a reply nor appeared before the concerned authorities. 3. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. 2. Learned counsel for the respondents accept notice. 3. The petitioner has filed the present petition inter-alia impugning an order dated 26.12.2023. 4. The petitioner also impugns the Notification No. 9/2023-Central Tax dated 31.03.2023, whereby the time limit specified under Section 73 (10) of Central Goods and Services Act, 2017 (hereafter “the CGST Act, 2017”) for passing an order under Section 73 (9) of the CGST Act, 2...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


28
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)