^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

FALGUNGIRI MINES vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
(Allahabad High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SHEKHAR B. SARAF
VIKAS BUDHWAR

Pet. Counsel

Ishir Sripat

Satyarth Agarwal

Siddharth Agrawal

Res. Counsel

Priyanka Midha

C.s.c.

A.s.g.i.

Petitioner / Applicant	FALGUNGIRI MINES
Respondent	UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS
Court	Allahabad High Court
State	Uttar Pradesh
Date	Aug 31, 2024
Order No.	WRIT TAX No. - 1369 of 2024
Citation	2024(8) TAXREPLY 10703
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Ms. Priyanka Midha, learned counsel appearing on behalf of respondent nos. 2 and 4. 2. It has been informed by the parties that the issue with regard to the fact as to whether GST was to be paid on the royalty as was payable by the miners was engaging the attention of the Supreme Court in SLP (C) No. 37326 of 2017. Learned counsel for the petitioners has also stated that in the SLP the payment of the GST on royalty paid for mining had been stayed. 3. Upon hearing learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties, it appears that at the matter requires consideration and the affidavits are required to be exchanged between the parties. 4. Accordingly, let the counter affidavit be filed within four weeks; rejoinder affidavit if any, within two week thereafter. 5. Similar issue raised in the present petition is already engaging attention of this Court in Writ Tax No. 475 of 2021. Accordingly, list this case along with the Writ....