Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,950 Results

VIBHU BAKHRU, J. (ORAL) 1. Issue notice. 2. The learned counsel appearing for respondents no. 1 & 2 accepts notice. 3. The petitioner impugns an order dated 24.04.2024 (hereafter the impugned order) under Section 73 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter CGST Act) and Delhi Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereafter DGST Act), inter alia, raising a tax demand of ₹88,89,593/-. 4. The petitioner has challenged the impugned order on several grounds ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

MITALI SAHA vs. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Jul 8, 2024)

JUDGMENT   RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J: 1. Affidavits of service filed in Court today is retained with the record. 2. Although, the present writ petition has been filed inter alia, challenging the notifications dated 5th July 2022 and 31st March 2023 issued under Section 168A of the CGST/WBGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”), at the very outset Mr. Ray, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that he does 2 not want to proceed with t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER By this writ petition, an order dated 19.03.2024 imposing penalty on the petitioner is challenged. The petitioner originally carried on business from Door No.3, Om Sakthi Nagar, Bharathi Street. Since the petitioner had shifted to a new address on the date of inspection on 26.07.2022, the petitioner asserts that the GST registration was cancelled by order dated 01.09.2022. After the application for revocation thereof was rejected, the petitioner filed an appeal and also applied unde...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following. 1. We have heard Mr Rajiv Malhotra, the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. 2. It appears from the plain reading of the impugned order passed by the High Court that the anticipatory bail granted by the trial court came to be cancelled following the dictum as laid in the order passed by this Court in SLP (Crl) No 4212-4213 of 2019 (The State of Gujarat vs Choodamani Parmeshwaran Iyer) decided on 17 July 2023. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER UPON hearing the counsel the Court made the following Delay condoned. This Court is of the opinion that there is no infirmity in the judgment of the High Court, which is correctly appreciated. Accordingly, the special leave petition is dismissed. Pending applications, if any, are disposed of. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT (PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI NATH TILHARI) Heard Sri Venkatram Reddy Mantur, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri S. A. V. Saikumar, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Commercial Taxes for the respondents. 2. This writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following reliefs: “…to issue Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate Writ or Order or Direction declaring the action of the 1st Respondent ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An assessment order dated 30.08.2023 was issued in respect of alleged “non-payment of tax due of seigniorage fees under RCM” and alleged “short payment of taxes on outward supply”. 2. The petitioner filed a rectification application dated 27.11.2023 under Section 161 of applicable GST statutes. The petitioner states that such rectification petition was not disposed of within the time limit of six months. The present writ petition has been filed in these f...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This Writ Petition is disposed of at the time of admission after hearing the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Additional Government Pleader for the respondent. 2. The petitioner has challenged the impugned assessment order in GSTIN: 33AALCP3969M1ZQ for the assessment period from April-2022 to Sep-2022 dated 18.01.2024. 3. The impugned order precedes the notices in ASMT-10 dated 23.12.2022, DRC 01A dated 14.02.2023 and DRC 01 dated 10.03.2023 and also three ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An assessment order dated 09.01.2024 is assailed on the ground that the petitioner did not have a reasonable opportunity to contest the tax demand on merits. The petitioner asserts that he was unaware of proceedings culminating in the impugned order because the show cause notice and other communications were uploaded on the GST portal but not communicated to the petitioner through any other mode. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the tax proposals pertain to mis...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. P.K. Jena, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. Mr. A.K. Kedia, Junior Standing Counsel, CT & GST organization. 3. The Petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to quash the order dated 04.04.2024 passed by the Assistant Commissioner, CGST & Central Excise Jajpur Division, Jajpur in the Order-in- Original No. AC/GST/YSPL/JPR/09/2024. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner veh...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


28
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)