Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

ORDER Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Rajesh Tiwari, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel who appears on behalf of the department. This petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following main prayer:- "issue a writ or direction or pass an order in the nature of Certiorari quashing the impugned ex- parte demand order and show cause notice dated 16.12.2023 and 21.09.2023 (July 2017-March 2018) issued by the Deputy Commissioner, Sector 7, Lucknow Utt...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 28.03.2024 is subject to challenge in this writ petition. The petitioner received a demand letter dated 21.12.2023 with regard to the disparity between the e-way bills reflected in the e-way bill portal and the petitioner's GSTR 3B returns for assessment periods running from 2018-19 to 2020-21. 2. The petitioner submitted a reply dated 10.01.2024. Being dissatisfied with such reply, a show cause notice dated 29.01.2024 was issued. The petitioner re...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER UPON hearing the counsel, the Court made the following. Delay condoned. We are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment and, hence, the special leave petition is dismissed. Pending application(s), if any, shall stand disposed of. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

CHOUDHARY SALES CORPORATION vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Punjab and Haryana High Court | Jul 10, 2024)

ORDER JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (ORAL) 1. The petitioner through the instant petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India is seeking setting aside of order dated 12.06.2024 (Annexure P-16), where by respondent No. 8 has disposed of complaint dated 26.04.2024 filed by the petitioner. 2. The case of the petitioner is that Central GST Commissionerate, Jind vide communication dated 19.02.2020 attached its bank account in terms of Section 83 of the Central Goods and Servi...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORAL JUDGMENT (Per: HONOURABLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE) The petitioner, an assessee under the CGST Act, 2017, claims for refund of Input Tax Credit (ITC) accrued to the petitioner under the Value Added Tax (VAT) regime; when the petitioner was an assessee under the Bihar Value Added Tax Act, 2005. 2. We heard Sri Nikhil Kumar Agarwal for the petitioner and Sri Vikas Kumar, learned counsel for the State. 3. The petitioner’s contention is that during the VAT period, the petition...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER An order in original dated 30.04.2024 is challenged both on the ground of lack of jurisdiction and on the ground of non application of mind. Pursuant to show cause notice dated 29.12.2023, the petitioner submitted reply dated 23.01.2024. By such reply, the petitioner dealt with each defect indicated in the show cause notice. The impugned order was issued thereafter. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner referred to the screen shot of the GST portal and pointed out that a show ca...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

RAHUL SHARMA & OTHERS vs. CINEMA VENTURES PVT. LTD.


(National Anti Profiteering Authority | Jul 10, 2024)

ORDER 1. The present Report dated 31.01.2020 has been received from the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) on 31.01.2020 after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case and findings of investigation conducted by the DGAP are as under:- a) A reference had been received from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 02.05.2019, to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an appl...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present Report dated 07.02.2020 has been received from the Director-General of Anti-Profiteering (DGAP) on 12.02.2020 after a detailed investigation under Rule 129 (6) of the Central Goods & Service Tax (CGST) Rules, 2017. The brief facts of the case and findings of investigation conducted by the DGAP are as under:- a) A reference has been received from the Standing Committee on Anti-profiteering on 28.06.2019, to conduct a detailed investigation in respect of an applica...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

FAIVELEY TRANSPORT RAIL TECHNOLOGIES INDIA PRIVATE..


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Tamilnadu | Jul 10, 2024)

(Passed by Tamil Nadu State Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling under Section 101(1) of the Tamil Nadu Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) Preamble 1. In terms of Section 102 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act 2017/Tamil Nadu Goods & Services Tax Act 2017 (“the Act”, in Short), this Order may be amended by the Appellate authority so as to rectify any error apparent on the face of the record, if such error is noticed by the Appellate auth...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

R.N. GARG AND SONS vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Delhi High Court | Jul 10, 2024)

ORDER PER CM No.34842/2024 (for exemption) 1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exception. 2. The application is disposed of. W.P.(C) 8438/2024 3. Issue notice. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents accept notice. 5. The petitioner has filed the present petition, inter alia, praying as under: “a) Issue a writ of Certiorari, or any other suitable writ, order, or direction, to quash/set aside the impugned order dated 18.04.2024 & also...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


28
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)