^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

BLACK STONE WORKS vs. STATE OF JHARKHAND & OTHERS
(Jharkhand High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SUJIT NARAYAN PRASAD
ARUN KUMAR RAI

Pet. Counsel

Sumeet Gadodia

Shilpi Gadodia

Shruti Shekhar

Res. Counsel

Ravi Prakash Mishra

Petitioner / Applicant	BLACK STONE WORKS
Respondent	STATE OF JHARKHAND & OTHERS
Court	Jharkhand High Court
State	Jharkhand
Date	Sep 9, 2024
Order No.	W. P. (T) No. 4945 of 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11119
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER PER 1. This instant writ petition has been filed for the following reliefs :- “(i) For issuance of further appropriate writ/order/direction, for quashing/setting aside the Notice contained in Form GST ASMT 10 (Annexure-2), issued vide Reference No. 266 dated 03.05.2024 in alleged exercise of the power under Section 61 of the JGST Act read with Rule 99(1) of the JGST Rules, especially because the very issuance of the said Notice is wholly without jurisdiction and is in excess of the power conferred upon Respondent-authority regarding scrutiny of returns, as provided under Section 61 of the JGST Act.” 2. Mr. Sumeet Gadodia, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, has submitted that the similar matter has been disposed of by this Court vide order dated 28.08.2024 passed in W.P.(T) No.4733 of 2024 and the fact of the present case is squarely covered with the order passed by this Court in W.P.(T) No.4733 of 2024. 3. It has, therefore....