^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

BONDALAPATI SRINIVASA RAO vs. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER
(Telangana High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

SUJOY PAUL
NAMAVARAPU RAJESHWAR RAO

Pet. Counsel

P. Girish Kumar

P. Kamalakar

Res. Counsel

B. Mukherjee

Gadi Praveen Kumar

Petitioner / Applicant	BONDALAPATI SRINIVASA RAO
Respondent	THE JOINT COMMISSIONER
Court	Telangana High Court
State	Telangana
Date	Sep 9, 2024
Order No.	WRIT PETITION No. 24722 of 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11192
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

Related Tags :

☍

Section 107

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER PER (HON’BLE SUJOY PAUL,J) Heard Sri P. Girish Kumar, learned Senior Counsel representing Sri P. Kamalakar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Dominic Fernandes, learned Senior Standing Counsel for CBIC, for respondent Nos.1 and 2 and Sri B. Mukherjee, learned counsel representing Sri Gadi Praveen Kumar, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India, for respondent No.3. 2. The challenge is mounted to the Order-in-Original dated 22.05.2024 whereby an adverse order is passed against the petitioner, a Chartered Accountant. 3. Learned Senior Counsel for the petitioner, at the outset, fairly submits that although, the impugned order is appealable under Section 107 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017, the petition is maintainable because the impugned order is passed in utter violation of principles of natural justice. To bolster this, it is argued that when the petitioner was served with the show cause notice, in his reply, he requested to provide....