^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

MAX HAIR CLINIC PVT. LTD. vs. THE STATE TAX OFFICER, CHENNAI
(Madras High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

KRISHNAN RAMASAMY

Pet. Counsel

N. Viswanathan

Res. Counsel

T.n.c. Kaushik

Petitioner / Applicant	MAX HAIR CLINIC PVT. LTD.
Respondent	THE STATE TAX OFFICER, CHENNAI
Court	Madras High Court
State	Tamilnadu
Date	Sep 9, 2024
Order No.	W. P. No. 22641 of 2024 And WMP. No. 24675 of 2024
Citation	2024(9) TAXREPLY 11222
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
ORDER This writ petition is filed challenging the impugned ex-parte order No.GSTIN33/AAJCM2594H2ZA/2022-23 dated 15.02.2024 passed by the respondent herein and to quash the same. 2. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that they purchased certain goods from a registered supplier, namely, Haresh Enterprises who supplied the goods and provided the tax invoices and collected the tax from them. The tax so collected by the dealer was paid to the Government account and reported in their GSTR 3 B returns on account of which, the same was reflected in their auto populated GSTR 2 A returns. 3. He would also submit that the respondent merely on the basis of the fact that the registered supplier's GST registration was suspended on a subsequent date, issued a show cause notice to the petitioner asking them to pay entire input tax credit availed on the basis of the invoices issued by the said dealer along with interest and called for explanation from the ....