Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent in Reference No.ZA330523009824R, dated 03.05.2023, and quash the same and, consequently, direct the third respondent to issue Revocation Order. 2. Heard Mr.K.Chandrasekaran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.Sai Srujan Tayi, learned Senior Panel Counsel for the respondents, who takes notice on behalf of the respondents. With co...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER ( Per Hon’ble SP , J ) This Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution impugns the Order-in-Appeal (OIA) No.AAAR/04/2022 dated 16.07.2022, whereby the view of the Advance Ruling Authority dated 05.08.2021 (Annexure P-18) was affirmed. Petitioner’s case:- 2. The Government of India (GoI) entered into Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Government of Maldives for constructing a Police Academy funded by the GoI. In turn, the GoI appointed respo...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Aggrieved by an order passed under Section 73 of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the said Act’) dated 19th September, 2023 for the tax period from July 2017 to March, 2018, the petitioner had preferred an appeal under Section 107 of the said Act. Such appeal was filed on 8th April, 2024 along with pre-deposit of Rs.7,82,968/-. The appellate authority, however, by its order dated 24th May, 2024 rejected the said appeal, inter alia, on the ground t...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This Writ Petition has been filed seeking issuance of a Writ of Mandamus to direct the respondent to withdraw the FORMS GST DRC-13 & 16 dated 15.11.2023, 22.11.2023 & 24.11.2023 issued against the petitioner since the Appeal bearing No.43/2024 under Section 107 of GST Act 2017 is pending before the Additional/Joint Commissioner of GST & Central Excise (Appeals-1), Chennai 600 034 by De freezing the petitioner account the ICICI Bank Account No:150401000990, ICICI Bank, La...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT RAJA BASU CHOWDHURY, J: 1. The present writ application has been filed, inter alia, challenging the order of cancellation of registration of the petitioner under the Central/West Bengal Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (Hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”). 2. It is the petitioner’s case that on or about 30th November, 2022, the petitioner was served with a notice of show cause as to why the registration of the petitioner under the said Act shall n...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER 1. Delay condoned. 2. In the peculiar facts and circumstances of the case, we are not inclined to interfere with the impugned judgment(s) and order(s) of the High Court; hence, the special leave petitions are dismissed. 3. Pending application(s), if any, shall also stand disposed of. ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER 1. These civil writ petitions have been preferred under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, in sum and substance, with the following prayers and for the sake of convenience, the facts and prayer clauses are being taken from the case being D.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 5948/2019:- “a. To issue writ of mandamus and/or any other appropriate writ(s) for directions to the Respondents for permanent migration of the Petitioner’s Firm under the same Goods and S...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

A. ABDUL LATHEEF vs. STATE TAX OFFICER & OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | Aug 5, 2024)

JUDGMENT The petitioner is an Exporter who is registered under the CGST/SGST Act. According to the petitioner for the months of October, 2020, November 2020, December 2020, March 2021, April 2021 and May 2021 certain errors occurred while uploading GSTR-I as a result of certain refund due to the petitioner has not been processed and received by him. When this matter taken up for consideration on the last occasion the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 6th respondent submitted that...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT The petitioner is an assessee under the CGST/SGST Acts. He suffered Ext.P1 order of assessment for the year 2018-19. Petitioner has approached this Court, being aggrieved by the fact that the input tax credit has been denied to the petitioner on account of the provisions contained in Section 16(4) of the CGST/SGST Acts. 2. Heard both sides. 3. Having heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the Central Tax and Cent...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
BY THE BENCH 1. This is a review petition under Section 114 read with Order XLVII Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short the “CPC”) by the petitioner praying to review the order dated 19.06.2024 passed by this Court in W.P.(C) No. 14181 of 2024. 2. By the aforesaid order, the Division Bench of this Court has passed the following order in the writ:- “This matter is taken up by hybrid mode. 2. Heard Mr. R.P. Kar, learned Senior Counsel appearing ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


26
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)