^®
TaxReply India Private Limited

GST Library

Best GST Library

Subscription Plans

TaxGPT

GST News | Updates

GST Calendar

GST Case Laws

GST Case Laws Sitemap

GST Notifications, Circulars, Releases etc.

Act & Rules

Act & Rules (Multi-view)

GST Rates

HSN Codes ^New

GST Forms

GST Diary

GST Notebook

GST Fees Manager

GST Council Meetings

GST Set-off Calculator

ITC Reversal Calculator

E-invoice Calculator

Inverted Duty Calculator

GSTR-3B Manual

GSTR-9 Manual

GSTR-9C Manual

Full Site Search

E-way Bill

Finance Bill

GST e-books

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Our Services

🔒

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

🔒

^®

Subscribe Free GST updates on...

Subscribe to Best GST Library of India and get ahead of the rest. Click here for plans. | GST Act & Rules e-book Click here. |

MATANGI TRADERS vs. THE JOINT COMMR CT
(Andhra Pradesh High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

R RAGHUNANDAN RAO
HARINATH.N

Pet. Counsel

Vedula Srinivas

Res. Counsel

---

Petitioner / Applicant	MATANGI TRADERS
Respondent	THE JOINT COMMR CT
Court	Andhra Pradesh High Court
State	Andhra Pradesh
Date	Oct 16, 2024
Order No.	Writ Petition Nos. 20089, 20132, 20133, 20139, 20150 & 20162 of 2008
Citation	2024(10) TAXREPLY 11428
Add to Favorites	Add to favorites.
Download Original Order
Print (Full Page)
Print (Judgement Only)

TaxGPT ^Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

Listen this case in simple words

Audio Timeline

Audio Speed:

AA |

ORDER
COMMON ORDER: PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO As the issues raised in all these Writ Petitions are one and the same and they are being disposed of by way of this Common Order. 2. In all these cases, the petitioners are dealers dealing with Sodium Bicarbonate (Soda Ash) and Magnesium Sulphate (Epsom Salt). 3. All the petitioners, while being assessed under the Andhra Pradesh Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [for short “the APGST Act”] had claimed that the rate of tax payable on the sale of these goods would be 8% on the basis of G.O.Ms.No.189, dated 07.02.2005. 4. This contention was partly accepted by the Assessing Officer. However, some of these goods were sought to tax @12% on the ground that they are not covered under G.O.Ms.No.189, dated 07.02.2005. Aggrieved by the said Orders of Assessment, the petitioners had filed appeals against their respective Assessment Orders. The Appellate Deputy Commissioner (CT), Visakhapatnam accepted....