Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

USMAN PULAKKAL vs. STATE OF KERALA & OTHERS


(Kerala High Court | Aug 7, 2024)

ORDER PER This application has been filed under Sec.439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure by the sole accused in file No. EKMIU6/INT-26/2024-25 of the Kerala State Goods and Services Tax Department, Ernakulam which is registered against him for allegedly committing the offence punishable under Sec. 132 (1) (i) of the Central and State GST Act, 2017. The petitioner was arrested and remanded to judicial custody on 06.06.2024. 2. The crux of the prosecution case is that; the accused had ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R. RAGHUNANDAN RAO Heard Sri V. Siddharth Reddy, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, Sri Y.V. Anil Kumar, learned Central Government Counsel appearing for the 3rd respondent and Sri Y.N. Vivekananda, learned Standing Counsel appearing for respondents 1 and 2. 2. The petitioner is a registered dealer under the CGST Act. The petitioner was served with a show cause notice dated 14.10.2023 calling upon him to show cause as to why his regis...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GNRC LIMITED vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Gauhati High Court | Aug 7, 2024)

JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL) (VIJAY BISHNOI, CJ) Heard Dr. A. Saraf, learned senior counsel, assisted by Mr. P.K. Bora and Mr. B. Sarma, learned counsel for the appellants. Also heard Mr. S.C. Keyal, learned Standing Counsel, Central Goods & Service Tax, appearing for all the respondents. 2. These 4 (four) writ appeals have been preferred by the petitioner Company (appellants herein) being aggrieved with the judgment & order dated 19.06.2024 passed by the learned Single Jud...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GOPAL SAMANTA vs. THE UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Calcutta High Court | Aug 7, 2024)

ORDER 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is retained with the record. 2. Mr. Ray, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner, by placing reliance on the notifications dated 5th July 2022, 31st March 2023 and 28th December 2023 submits that the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs by the aforesaid notifications have extended the time limit as specified in Section 73(10) of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”) for issuance ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER 1. Affidavit of service filed in Court today is retained with the record. 2. Challenging the order dated 11th December 2023 passed under Section 73 of the WBGST/CGST Act, 2017 (hereinafter referred to as the “said Act”) for the tax period July 2017 to March 2018, the instant writ petition has been filed. 3. Mr. Ray, learned advocate appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner had no notice of the proceeding, as all notices were uploaded in the drop d...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ARIHANT STEEL vs. STATE OF U.P. AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 7, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Sri Parth Goswami, Advocate holding brief Sri Pranjal Shukla, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-respondents. 2. By means of instant writ petition, the petitioner has assailed the order dated 24.09.2019 passed by Assistant Commissioner, Sector- 8, State Goods & Service Tax, Bareilly as well as the impugned order dated 07.07.2022 passed by the Additional Commissioner, Grade-2 (Appeal) 1st, ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Heard Shri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Arvind Kumar Mishra, learned Standing Counsel for the State - respondents. 2. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 30.11.2023 passed by the respondent no. 1, the first appellate authority, as well as the impugned order dated 7.3.2020 passed by the respondent no. 2. 3. With the consent of the learned counsel for th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BANARAS INDUSTRIES vs. UNION OF INDIA AND OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 7, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE PIYUSH AGRAWAL, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record. Parcha filed by Shri K.J. Shukla on behalf of the Union of India is also taken on record. 2. Heard Shri Aditya Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, learned Standing Counsel for the State - respondents and learned counsel for the Union of India. 3. The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the impugned order dated 11.05.2022 passed by the respondent no. 5 under sect...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Mr. Kar, learned advocate appears on behalf of petitioner (assessee) and submits, show-cause notice dated 25th November, 2020 required, inter alia, his client to file reply thereto by 25th December, 2020. He demonstrates from disclosed reply dated 16th December, 2020, it was received by the office on 17th December, 2020. Yet, his client was not notified with date of personal hearing. All orders passed pursuant to said show-cause notice to be interfered with, to set them aside on hav...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
JUDGMENT The petitioner is a registered dealer under the CGST/SGST Act. According to the petitioner owing to mismatch between GSTR-I filed by the supplier and GSTR-3B filed by the petitioner certain input tax credit to which the petitioner was entitled has not been granted to him, as a result of which huge liability has been imposed on the petitioner together with interest and penalty. The petitioner has preferred Ext.P9 application under Section 161 of the CGST/SGST Act for rectification...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


27
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)