Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search
Text Search option

  12,927 Results

ORDER PER 1. Mr. Sahoo, learned senior advocate appears on behalf of petitioner and submits, his client had applied for rectification of order dated 30th December, 2023 made under section 73 of Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. He submits, his client can so apply under section 161 in Odisha Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The application was rejected by order dated 8th April, 2024. His client was not given opportunity of hearing. He seeks interference. 2. Mr. Mishra, learned advocat...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER Heard Mr.S.Sanskar Samdaria, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and Mr.V.Prashanth Kiran, learned Government Advocate (Tax) who takes notice on behalf of the first respondent. Considering the nature of relief to be granted herein, notice to the second respondent is dispensed with. With consent, the main Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal at the stage of admission itself. 2. The challenge in this Writ Petition is to the order dated 31.10.2023 passed by th...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The present Writ Petition is filed for the issuance of a Writ of Certiorari, to call for records relating to impugned order bearing GSTIN.33AACCA4371K1ZR/2017-2018, dated 26.12.2023 passed by the First Respondent and quash the same. 2. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that on scrutiny of the returns filed by the petitioner, the Department has issued a show cause notice in Form DRC-01 dated 27.09.2023 wherein it has been alleged that the petitioner has availed exces...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned AGA and perused the material available on record. 2. The instant application for grant of anticipatory bail has been moved by applicants- 1. Anant Bansal and 2. Nikhil Bansal who happen to be the son and father in the matter of summons dated 15.3.2024 and 20.6.2024 issued against them by DGGI, Lucknow Zonal Unit (LZU), Lucknow under Section 70 of the CGST...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

D.K. ENTERPRISES vs. THE SUPERINTENDENT AND OTHERS


(Andhra Pradesh High Court | Aug 7, 2024)

ORDER PER HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE R RAGHUNANDAN RAO The petitioner was registered under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (herein referred to as C.G.S.T. Act). On 13.10.2023, a show-cause notice was issued to the petitioner calling upon him to show cause why his registration should not be cancelled. The petitioner had thereupon, submitted a letter dated 17.10.2023 seeking time to reply to the show-cause notice. On 27.10.2023, the 1st respondent had issued an order for can...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VAISHNO POLYMERS vs. UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS


(Gujarat High Court | Aug 7, 2024)

ORAL ORDER (PER : HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE BHARGAV D. KARIA) 1. Heard learned advocate Mr. Hardik P. Modh for the petitioner and learned advocate Mr. Utkarsh R. Sharma for the respondent nos. 2 and 3. 2. By this petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has prayed for the following reliefs: “(a) That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to declare that the Brooms sticks imported by the petitioner which are made out of Cocos Nucifera and Nypha F...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
COMMON ORDER By this common order, these five Writ Petitions are taken up for disposal. 2. The Writ Petitions in W.P.(MD)Nos.18870 to 18873 of 2024 are filed challenging the impugned orders made under Section 62 of the TNGST Act, 2017, on the premise that the petitioner has failed to furnish the Return for the period from April to July 2023 within the prescribed period. The impugned orders made under Section 62 also provided that if the petitioner files the Return within a period of 3...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER This writ petition has been filed challenging the order in Form GST DRC - 07 in GSTIN: 33AAGPE0732P1ZU/2021-2022 and the consequential order in Reference No.ZD3308231060700, dated 18.08.2023, passed by the respondent. 2. According to the petitioner, they are a registered dealer on the files of the respondent and GST Department. For the Financial Year 2021-2022, they filed monthly returns in GSTR 3B and GSTR 1 and duly paid tax liability. On scrutiny of the same, the respondent i...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

GURMEET SINGH BATRA vs. UNION OF INDIA


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 7, 2024)

ORDER HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. This bail application has been filed by the applicant - Gurmeet Singh Batra @ Sahil seeking bail in Case No. 22362 of 2023 under Sections 132(1)(b), 132(1)(c), 132(1)(f), 132(1)(1) and 132(1)(i) of C.G.S.T. Act, 2017, D.G.G.I. Ghaziabad Unit. 2. Brief facts of the case, as culled out from the record, are that the officers of D.G.G.I., Meerut Zonal Unit received an information that a racket indulged in creation of 3100 fake ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER The subject matter of challenge in the present writ petition pertains to the impugned suspension order issued by the 2nd respondent in Proc.No.CD2/5566023/2023 dated 01.11.2023. 2. The petitioner is working in the post of Commercial Tax Officer which has now been re-designated as the State Tax Officer. He is assigned with the statutory duties under the Goods and Service Tax Act (GST) with effect from 01.07.2017. Among many other statutory functions, the petitioner has also been ...
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


27
Apr
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
28 Apr

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Mar 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).

30 Apr

☑ Quarterly | QRMP

Last date for opt-in / opt-out QRMP Scheme for quarter Apr - June 2025 (Rule 61A)