Login | Register

GST Library

TaxReply Support

YouTube Videos

Twitter

Buy Premium Tax Domains

About Us

Contact Us

Our Services

TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,292 Results

SAHU TRADING COMPANY vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 8, 2019)

ORDER Heard Sri Shubham Agrawal, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Anant Kumar Tiwari, learned counsels for the respondents. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council respondent no.2 to make recommendations to the State Government to extend the time period for filing of GST Tran-1 in the case of the petitioner because his application was not entertained on the last date i.e. 27.12.2017 and he is permitted to file his complete GST TRAN-1 for the necess...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Mr.B.Sathish Sundar, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before this Court. Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax accepts notice on behalf of both the respondents. 2.Notwithstanding several avements made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and notwithstanding several grounds raised / contentions urged in the affidavit filed in support of the instant writ petition, learned counsel for writ petitioner, on instructions, submitted that...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
Mr.B.Sathish Sundar, learned counsel on record for writ petitioner is before this Court. Mr.A.P.Srinivas, learned senior Standing Counsel for Income Tax accepts notice on behalf of both the respondents. 2.Notwithstanding several avements made in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition and notwithstanding several grounds raised / contentions urged in the affidavit filed in support of the instant writ petition, learned counsel for writ petitioner, on instructions, submitted that...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
ORDER: As to whether the amendment to Section 50 of the Central GST Act, 2017 would be retrospective and whether a notice was liable to be issued to the petitioner before attachment of his account requires examination. There shall accordingly be interim stay of the proceedings as prayed for. ...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VIMAL YASHWANTGIRI GOSWAMI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Aug 7, 2019)

1. One of the main reliefs prayed for by the writ applicant in the present writ application reads as follows : “16(A) To issue a Writ of Mandamus and/or Writ of Prohibition and/or any other appropriate writ, order of direction, directing the respondents not to take any actions against the petitioner being proprietor of the Heugo Metal exercising powers under Section 69 read with Section 132 without following due procedure of law of assessment and adjudication of alleged evasion of G...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SINGAL ROAD CARRIER vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Aug 7, 2019)

Rule returnable on 28/08/2019. Ms. Maithili Mehta, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. It appears from the materials on record that the writ-applicant herein is engaged in the business of transportation. He claims to be the owner of a Truck bearing registration No. RJ14GK4863, which came to be seized by the respondents authorities alongwith the goods while in transit. The writ-applicant is here before this Court with a praye...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

JAY BHAVANI METAL MART vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Aug 7, 2019)

Rule returnable on 28/08/2019. Ms. Maithili Mehta, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. It appears from the materials on record that the writ-applicant herein is engaged in the business of trading of metal scrap. The transporter claims to be the owner of a Truck bearing registration No. GJ03BT8301, which came to be seized by the respondents authorities alongwith the goods while in transit. This writ-application has something to d...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KANCHAN METAL vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Aug 7, 2019)

Rule returnable on 28/08/2019. Ms. Maithili Mehta, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondents. It appears from the materials on record that the writ-applicant herein is engaged in the business of trading of metal scrap. The transporter claims to be the owner of a Truck bearing registration No. GJ03BT8301, which came to be seized by the respondents authorities alongwith the goods while in transit. This writ-application has something to d...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM APPL. 35613/2019 (addl. documents) 1. For the reasons stated therein, the application is allowed. The additional documents are taken on record. W.P.(C) 3290/2019 2. Learned counsel for the Petitioners points out that due to the technical glitches the Petitioners are unable to rectify the TRAN-1 form. 3. This Court has in a series of orders including the order dated 13th May 2019 in WP(C) 1280 of 2018 (Bhargava Motors v. UOI), order dated 22nd July 2019 in WP(...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM Appl. No. 20278/2019 (Exemption) 1. Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P(C) No. 4556/2019 2. Notice was issued in the present petition on 30th April, 2019 itself i.e. more than 3 months ago. Learned counsel for the Respondents, however, states that he is still awaiting instructions. 3. The point involved is whether the Respondent was justified in rejecting the credit claimed in the TRAN-2 forms filed by the Petitioner only on the ground that the ...
Add to Fav
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


23
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).