Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,292 Results

UTTAR PRADESH POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LIMIT..


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Aug 5, 2019)

ORDER M/s. Uttar Pradesh Power Transmission Corporation Limited, Shakti Bhawan, 14-A, Ashok Marg, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh - 226020 (hereinafter called the applicant) is a registered assessee under GST having GSTN  09AAACU8823E1Z9. 2.  The applicant is notified as the state transmission utility of Uttar Pradesh and entrusted with the business of transmission of electrical energy to various licensees within the State of Uttar Pradesh. 3.  The Applicant has submitted ap...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

ATUL KUMAR RAJPAL


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Uttar Pradesh | Aug 5, 2019)

ORDER M/s. Atul Kumar Rajpal, 44CA, Rajpal Plaza, Sringar Nagar, Kanpur Road, Alambagh, Lucknow-226005 (hereinafter called the applicant) is a registered assessee under GST having GSTN : 09ADXPR2479Q123. 2.  The applicant plans to manufacture and sell "Namkeen" duly sealed & packed in printed pouches containing the details of the manufacturer. 3.  The Applicant has submitted application for Advance Ruling dated 9-5-2019 enclosing duly filled Form ARA-01 (th...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DANGAR VASHRAMBHAI ARJANBHAI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Aug 2, 2019)

Rule returnable on 07/08/2019. Ms. Maithili Mehta, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent no.1 – State of Gujarat. The respondents nos.2 and 3 shall be served directly. It appears from the materials on record that the writ-applicant herein is engaged in the business of Transport. He claims to be the owner of a Truck bearing registration No. GJ04X7165, which came to be seized by the respondents authorities alongwith the goods wh...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

KHAMAL RAMESHBHAI VALABHAI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Aug 2, 2019)

Rule returnable on 07/08/2019. Ms. Maithili Mehta, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent no.1 – State of Gujarat. The respondents nos.2 and 3 shall be served directly. It appears from the materials on record that the writ-applicant herein is engaged in the business of Transport. He claims to be the owner of a Truck bearing registration No. GJ-16X9925, which came to be seized by the respondents authorities alongwith the goods w...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

DANGAR BHAGWANBHAI MITHABHAI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Aug 2, 2019)

Rule returnable on 07/08/2019. Ms. Maithili Mehta, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent no.1 – State of Gujarat. The respondents nos. 2 and 3 shall be served directly. It appears from the materials on record that the writ-applicant herein is engaged in the business of Transport. He claims to be the owner of a Truck bearing registration No. GJ04U5196, which came to be seized by the respondents authorities alongwith the goods w...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner in W.P (C) No.14719/2019 is challenging the interim order passed by the Single Judge, dated 29th May, 2019. The respondents herein are the respondents in the writ petition. 2. The appellant challenged validity of Section 129 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 (CGST Act for short), to the extent it provides imposition of tax and penalty in the manner as set out therein, in cases where there are only mere technical breaches or contraventions of the provisions of ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
2. The petitioner, apprehending invocation of bank guarantee furnished by the petitioner during the proceedings under Section 129 of the Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Act, (for short 'GST Act') has filed this writ petition. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner has substantial grounds to challenge the order made under Section 129 and the remedy available in this behalf is filing appeal under Section 107 of the GST Act. 4. After perusing the...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

VIKALP JAIN vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 2, 2019)

Heard Sri Dhiraj Srivastava Senior Advocate, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned A.G.A. for the State. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner who is involved in Case No. 17 of 2018, under Section 132(1) (a) CGST department (CIU), Noida for prayer to set aside the impugned judgement and order dated 19.07.2019 passed by Special Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, rejecting the prayer of the petitioner to waive or reduce one of the conditions of bail to deposit ₹ 1 C...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

BATTA NARENDRABHAI MEGHABHAI vs. STATE OF GUJARAT


(Gujarat High Court | Aug 2, 2019)

Rule returnable on 07/08/2019. Ms. Maithili Mehta, the learned AGP waives service of notice of rule for and on behalf of the respondent no.1 – State of Gujarat. The respondents nos. 2 and 3 shall be served directly. It appears from the materials on record that the writ-applicant herein is engaged in the business of Transport. He claims to be the owner of a Truck bearing registration No. GJ01BY6197, which came to be seized by the respondents authorities alongwith the goods ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

NES GLOBAL SPECIALIST ENGINEERING SERVICES PRIVATE..


(Appellate Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Aug 2, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 101 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) At the outset, we would like to make it clear that the provisions of both the CGST Act and the MGST Act are the same except for certain provisions. Therefore, unless a mention is specifically made to such dissimilar provisions, a reference to the CGST Act would also mean a reference to the same provisions under the MGST Act. The present appeal has be...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


23
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).