Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

GST Case Laws


TaxReply Citation TAXREPLY
Court
High Court
State
Search by Related Tags
  OR

  OR

  OR
Date (From)
Date (To)
Name of Party
Text Search

  13,306 Results

The petitioner filed appeal in Ext.P2 aggrieved by the order of assessment in Ext.P1 and rectified order in Ext.P1a made under KGST Act. The petitioner has filed the appeal with Ext.P3 stay petition. The petitioner prays for appropriate direction to the appellate authority to consider and dispose of Ext.P3 expeditiously. 2. The case of petitioner is that either the mere filing of appeal or mere pendency of appeal does not amount to granting stay by the appellate authority. The delay in co...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

THE TYRE PLAZA vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS.


(Delhi High Court | Aug 20, 2019)

CM APPL. 37003/2019 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 8970/2019 & CM APPL. 37002/2019(stay) 2. Notice. Respective counsel for the Respondents as noted above accepts notice. 3. This is one other case, where on account of technical glitches, a registered dealer is unable to claim transitional credit under DVAT Act and input tax credit which works out to ₹ 65,03,389/-, in Form TRAN–1. 4. Learned counsel for the Petitioner points ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
CM APPL. 37004/2019 (Exemption) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. W.P.(C) 8971/2019 & CM APPL. 37005/2019(direction) 2. Notice. Respective counsel for the Respondents as noted above accepts notice. 3. This is one other case, where on account of technical glitches, a registered dealer is unable to claim input tax credit (ITC) which works out to ₹ 3,82,08,278.53 in Form TRAN–1. 4. The Petitioner states that it uploaded its claim for ITC on account ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

SAHIB AUTOMOBILES vs. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS


(Allahabad High Court | Aug 20, 2019)

Heard Sri Vishwjit, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri O.P.Srivastava, learned Counsel for the respondents no.1 & 3 and Shri R.C. Shukla, learned counsels for the respondents no.4. The petitioner seeks a writ of mandamus directing the GST council respondent no.2 to make recommendations to the State Government to extend the time period for filing of GST TRAN-1 and TRAN-2 in the case of the petitioner because his application was not entertained on the last date i.e. 27.12.2017 and ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The petitioner challenges Ext.P4 series notices issued by the 1st respondent as illegal and without jurisdiction. Ext.P4(b) is an order of detention made under Section 129 (1) of CGST Act, 2017 and Ext.P4(c) is a notice issued under Section 129 (3) of the Act. The petitioner contends that the subject matter of Ext.P4 series notices is fully compliant with all the requirements of the Act and the petitioner was in a position to demonstrate within the time given by the authorities that Part B/E-...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

M/S. GUJARAT ENERGY TRANSMISSION CORPORATION LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Gujrat | Aug 20, 2019)

2. M/s Gujarat Energy Transmission Corporation Ltd., Sardar Patel Vidyut Bhavan, Race Course, Vadodara-390007 (herein after referred to as the “Applicant” or “GETCO” for the sake of brevity), vide Annexure ‘A’ sheet to their application dated 08.02.2018, specifically mentioned their queries as under: “Whether or not the cost of construction/ erection of Bays/ Sub-Stations, Overhead lines and Underground Cables and other charges including Pro-rata ...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

EMRALD HEIGHTS INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Madhya Pradesh | Aug 20, 2019)

1. The present application has been filed u/s 97 of the Central Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 and MP Goods & Services Tax Act, 2017 (hereinafter also referred to CGST Act and SGST Act respectively) by M/s. Emrald Heights International School (hereinafter referred to as the Applicant) , not registered but desirous of obtaining registration under the Goods & Services Tax. 2. The provisions of the CGST Act and MPGST Act are identical, except for certain provisions. The...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

TEJAS CONSTRUCTIONS & INFRASTRUCTURE PVT LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Aug 20, 2019)

PROCEEDINGS (Under Section 98 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017) The Present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as “the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/s. TEJAS CONSTRUCTIONS & INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the follow...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in

AJWANI INFRASTRUCTURE PVT. LTD.


(Authority for Advance Ruling, Maharashtra | Aug 20, 2019)

The present application has been filed under section 97 of the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 and the Maharashtra Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017 [hereinafter referred to as the CGST Act and MGST Act”] by M/s. AJWANI INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED, the applicant, seeking an advance ruling in respect of the following questions. 1. GST Rate on the work of “Development of Infrastructure facility for Passenger Water Transport Terminal” at Nerul, Navi Mumbai awarde...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
The appellant herein is the petitioner in WP(C) No.16124/2019, challenging the judgment of the Single Judge, dated 13.06.2019. The respondents in the appeal are the respondents in the writ petition. 2. An order passed by the 1st respondent under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act (CGST Act) and the Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Act (KSGST Act) imposing tax and penalty to the tune of ₹ 9,03,190/- was challenged by the appellant in the writ petition. The learned Sin...
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Summarize this case by TaxGPT in


23
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).