Login | Register
GST Library
TaxReply Support
YouTube Videos
Twitter
Buy Premium Tax Domains
About Us
Contact Us
Our Services
TaxReply India Pvt Ltd

VERA DISPLAY AND STORAGE PRODUCTS PVT. LTD. vs. STATE TAX OFFICER (INTELLIGENCE) , ERNAKULAM, THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANATHAPURAM AND THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANATHAPURAM
(Kerala High Court)

Hon'ble Judges:

C.K.ABDUL REHIM
R. NARAYANA PISHARADI
Pet. Counsel
P.s.soman
T.radhamany
Res. Counsel
Mohammed Rafiq

Petitioner / Applicant

VERA DISPLAY AND STORAGE PRODUCTS PVT. LTD.

Respondent STATE TAX OFFICER (INTELLIGENCE) , ERNAKULAM, THE STATE OF KERALA, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANATHAPURAM AND THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX, REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY, TAXES DEPARTMENT, THIRUVANATHAPURAM
Court Kerala High Court
State

Kerala

Date Aug 19, 2019
Order No.

WA. No. 1591 OF 2019

Citation

2019(8) TAXREPLY 2079
Original Order
My Favorites
Add to Fav ☆
Add to favorites.
Related Tags :

TaxGPT Beta

Summarize this case by TaxGPT in
  AA   |   Print

ORDER

The appellant herein is the petitioner in WP(C) No.16124/2019, challenging the judgment of the Single Judge, dated 13.06.2019. The respondents in the appeal are the respondents in the writ petition. 2. An order passed by the 1st respondent under Section 129 of the Central Goods and Service Tax Act (CGST Act) and the Kerala State Goods and Service Tax Act (KSGST Act) imposing tax and penalty to the tune of ₹ 9,03,190/- was challenged by the appellant in the writ petition. The learned Single Judge found that the appellant is having the remedy of a statutory appeal against the said order. Therefore the writ petition was dismissed without making any observation on the merits and leaving open the appellant to agitate the issue before the statutory Appellate Authority on all grounds available. Encashment of the Bank Guarantee furnished by the appellant at the time of release of the consignment was stayed for a period of two weeks from the date of the impugned judgment, in order to f....

Premium Content !

This is premium content of TaxReply, available to paid subscribers only.

Kindly Subscribe GST Library to unlock all features.
View Subscription Plans
Download Full Judgement :
23
May
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
25 May

☑ Monthly | PMT-06

PMT-06 Monthly tax payment for Apr 2025 under QRMP Scheme [Rule 61(1)(ii) - Proviso to Section 39(7)].

Taxpayers have a choice to pay tax either, as per -  

A) Fixed Sum Method OR 
B) Self assessment basis subject to interest on short payment of taxes.
(Notification No.85/2020 - CT)
 
28 May

☑ Monthly | GSTR-11

GSTR-11 for the m/o Apr 2025 (Statement of inward supplies by persons having Unique Identification Number (UIN)).